Agnostic.com

2 1

‘Acts of God’ and the climate crisis: Who’s responsible?

[onlysky.media]

xenoview 8 Feb 19
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

From you link: The precedent in case law is defined by Nugent v Smith (1876) which says that an act of God is caused by “elementary forces of nature unconnected with the agency of man or other cause.” It is understandable that such an archaic term would originate in 16th Century English law, but why has it survived in current law? A more descriptive term would be “act of nature,” or better yet, “natural event.”

It is called God before it was called nature. Changing the name does not change what it is. Hierarchy continuum understanding: god has a newer used name: nature.

God or nature either way it is called still exist, atheism illogical.

Word Level 8 Feb 20, 2022
1

It’s all on us humans.

I agree with you. We have done all of it.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:651582
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.