Oh, and one more thing....
'Trending Politics ran a story yesterday headlined, “Wuhan Laboratory Found to Have Conducted Novel Monkeypox Research One Year Before Global Outbreak.”
What awful disease WEREN’T this crazy Chinese scientists working on in that Wuhan lab?
The article reported that a February 2022 study published in Virologica Sinica, the official journal of the Chinese Society of Microbiology, explained the process for artificially enhancing a monkeypox virus. The kicker is that the study’s authors include, you guessed it, scientists from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which continues happily tinkering with dangerous viruses to this day.
It gets better. The study’s lead author and publisher is Editor-in-Chief Zheng-Li Shi, now the DIRECTOR of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, who you may recall was widely known in 2020 as the “Bat Lady” who researched how to increase transmissibility of coronaviruses at the lab. Looks like she got a promotion for all that excellent work.
Investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson recently suggested that the new monkeypox virus may also have gained increased transmissibility functions, somehow. Attkisson wrote, “This isn’t like previous encounters with the [monkeypox] virus. The widespread nature of the outbreak and evidence of frequent human-to-human transmission has researchers questioning whether the virus has changed to become more transmissible.”
Yes, but HOW could it have changed to become more transmissible? One day we’ll have to look into what’s really going on inside that Chinese lab. If only we had a huge federal health agency that could … oh never mind.' Jeff Childers - 'Coffee and Covid'
0
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
3 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.From Bat shit from hell to monkey business with our lives, that totally sucks.
Castlepaloma
Level 8
May 26, 2022
1
A little light reading on the subject.
Efficient assembly of a large fragment of monkeypox virus genome as a qPCR template using dual-selection based transformation-associated recombination - [virosin.org]
BDair
Level 8
May 25, 2022
0
They say monkey pox can be vaccine related with aids and small pox. They already have the treatment or cure ready from Wuhan's China Lab. What a zombie/robot and sheep sucker assembly line they got Coming and going.
Oh look... Now you're an expert on monkeypox!!!.... Damn boy!!!
Redneckliberal
Level 7
May 25, 2022
0
If you have any information that challenges the veracity of the commentary posted above, you are welcome to share it here.
@Redneckliberal You can read this paper and become an expert.
[virosin.org]
@bdair same bullshit different day with you....
Pull up your boots, because the B.S. (aka Facts that you can not disprove) are going to pile ever higher as new information emerges.
@bdair youve been spouting that line forever.... Sounds like q anon
It is really simple. All you have to do is post something in rebuttal to the information I have posted. Espousing your opinion that it is B.S. is not at all constructive. If you know something, present your facts for discussion.
@bdair trending politics is a site 'dedicated to keeping up with president trump"... This and other similar sites is where you find your bullshit... Take your q anon bullshit and shove it up your ass
Again, it is fine that you have an opinion. But, if you have nothing to refute the posted information then you are just a dickering cockwomble.
@bdair it's your source you fucking dimwit....
It is you that is continually demonstrating a diminished cerebral capacity. You have proven unable to provide a single counter argument.
@bdair your sources are bullshit right wing conspiracy sites... You fucking dimwit.... Gfy
You offer no evidence of your being capable of having a rational thought. The commentary above is from Jeff Childers, 'Coffee and Covid' on Substack, which cites a piece from Trending Politics which cites an article from a scientific journal. I already linked the journal article for you so you can confirm for yourself the content. Obviously you prefer to remain willfully ignorant and unwilling to consider new information that challenges your longstanding indoctrination.
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.