So, I'm guessing what the Supreme Court is saying is that it's OK to take your gun down to the hospital when you're having your baby.
3
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
2 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.
You would if the medical facility allowed guns on the premise. It probably won't but that will be the next SCOTUS gun case, I suppose. As an aside, the child is not really yours if the state made you have it through duress. Intimidation. I would sue the state for every penny that child costs me.
rainmanjr
Level 8
June 25, 2022
1
@hankster Ownership isn't the problem. Being forced into ownership of something which my morals had no problem aborting is a legal crime called duress. Any contract signed under duress is null/void but one has to prove duress. This seems pretty easy to prove and that means I was economically aggrieved. I would seek my money back.
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.