the truly brainwashed won't accept any of this regardless of the credentials.
[clarkcountytoday.com]
"Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures,” the declaration reads.
"The real cost...", global high temps, massive wildfires, serious droughts, a stronger & more prolonged hurricane season, ... & the list goes on.
Sure we need CO2, but an excess amount leads to consequences, & we're seeing that. Just because plants use it doesn't mean that more & more is beneficial, for them, us or the atmosphere. This article is so inaccurate & slanted & this is your best shot? Sure, all info should be scrutinized, but how well did you scrutinize this article? You jumped on it right away because it fits the narrative you want.
Not gonna listen to sum hoity toity elite college boy when my cousin, on Facebook, the one who married our cousin from Arkansas, tells me all I needs to no. He gots his GED. Only took him six times. He had an ipaddy thing and when he ain't looking at porn, he reads all we ever need to no. That and me an my wife, I met her walking her dog when we both was living at the trailer park, listen to Tuck on fox. No needs fo any fancy book learnin. Ah shit, here comes the preacher and I ain't ben to church in quites the wile.
I know, a poor excuse for humor on a damn serious subject.