I think we have to start asking, "How much can you water down scientific protocol and still call it science?"
They need faster regulatory approval because of the speed with which viral mutations happen, making vaccines obsolete regarding specific strains. So, they change the rules to approve new commercial products quicker and then...................they are soon absolete and here we go again.
Yet they still call these covid medicines vaccines.
I'm very angry at these "expert" medical bodies for trashing sciences good name with their bodgey "follow the science, safe and highly effective" crap.
In science, when your experiments fall outside the protocols disproving your hypothesis, you don't react by changing the protocols and redefining to suit your needs.

Does this concern anyone else? Scientific principals being compromised?
Can any put forward an articulate and informed argument as to why these medicines are classed as vaccines because meaningful immunity is not provided at all. Lots of double boosted catching covid still.
Calling these medicines vaccines is just wrong, as in not correct, in a biological sense.
[msn.com]