(Most of todays republicans are absent of responsibility and accountability...)
An underrated component of Donald Trump’s success in the 2016 Republican primary was that he acted as a megaphone for the fringier elements of conservative media. Sites like Stephen K. Bannon’s Breitbart were elevating various far-right theories and stories, scooping up an audience that Fox News, then more constrained, was leaving on the table. Trump was a Breitbart reader and looped the site’s claims into his speeches and interviews. The right-wing fringe of the party — who also read Breitbart — responded by blanketing him with support.
Why? In part because they were frustrated that sitting elected officials and more-mainstream outlets like Fox weren’t saying the things Breitbart was. There was an obvious reason for that: much of what Breitbart offered was false or overheated or otherwise dishonest. And in the Republican establishment of 2015, when Trump announced, there was still a lingering belief that elected officials shouldn’t simply peddle conspiracy theories or misrepresent reality. That belief had eroded in the post-tea party era, certainly, but it lingered.
Until Trump showed that abandoning it entirely offered a different set of rewards. In the same way that Breitbart and even fringier sites like Infowars gobbled up attention by appealing to people’s anti-institutional and conspiratorial sensibilities, candidates for office began doing the same. The nonsense trickled up and is now pervasive. ...
I will continue to say that this trickling up is good for Dems and, if we can't win against such nonsense, then we aren't worthy of running campaigns. Their demonization of the left has been so successful that they can now run childish Theocrats and still win. That's our fault for letting them do that.