Agnostic.com

6 5

If you were to create a fictional character to serve as a metaphor for the entirety of reality, what characteristics would you give the character? Would it be human, animal, plant or inanimate object? Would it have certain personality traits? How would you symbolize the character of the combined forces of nature in a single fictitious character?

skado 9 Dec 3
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

6 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

With all the anthropophuistic folderol formable, and although it has many names, I would call it 'nature'.

Its symbol is a simplex of zero.

Nature works.
Beautiful performance.

[facebook.com]

0

Sadly I can not. Since it has already been done many years ago.

Plato's cave dweller. A creature so drowned in the products and outputs of its own culture, it can neither move nor see.

1

Some people do. They call the character God. Poor delusionals.

Creating a metaphor for a complex abstraction is delusional?

@skado believing it is real and trying to impose it on others, is.

@skado some perspectives yield lots of glare.

@David1955
Right, but you realize that's not what this post is about.

@hankster

i tend to believe the glare is in the eye of the beholder.

@skado yep. shadow puppet freakout.

@skado what has "complex abstraction" to do with puerile diety constructs?

@AnneWimsey
I don't know.

@skado me either.
let's call the whole thing off!

@AnneWimsey
Consider it called.

1

a fart perhaps.

2

gumby is close.

3

How about a monkey flinging poo on a ferris wheel?

Good one! 🤣

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:698418
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.