Agnostic.com

2 2

LINK Missouri Republicans' Dress Code for Women Blasted: 'So Many Questions' -- Newsweek

Missouri House Republicans' decision on Wednesday to tighten the dress code for women legislators has sparked criticism and outrage on social media, with many questioning why no similar rules were imposed on men.

The new measure, prohibiting women legislators from having bare arms while in the chamber and initially calling for blazers to be mandatory, was spurred by Missouri's Republican Representative Ann Kelley during the House's opening session.

The proposed changes reportedly originated in last year's session, when several lawmakers complained that some of their female colleagues weren't dressed at the required standard. The update was immediately bashed by Missouri House Democrats, who questioned whether changes to the chamber's dress code were really that high on the list of priorities.

But despite the criticism, the measure was eventually passed with some changes, allowing women legislators to wear cardigans as well as jackets in the chamber, but still preventing them from showing their bare arms to "maintain a formal and professional atmosphere."

The dress code for women lawmakers now states that "proper attire for women shall be business attire, including jackets worn with dresses, skirts, or slacks, and dress shoes or boots."

News of the decision in the Republican-controlled Missouri House of Representatives sparked significant backlash online, with many questioning the need to control how women dress in the chamber.

"Wait. How come only MEN are allowed to bare arms? I have so many questions...," author David Brin wrote on Twitter.
Newsweek subscription offers >

"Reminds me of parochial school rules for girls in the 60's: no teased hair, no bare arms, no white blouses (boys might see your training bra) & no skirt hems above the knee. Geez," commented journalist and author Jill Geisler.

snytiger6 9 Jan 14
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

This is why we can't have nice things.

1

This isn't the 50s for crying out loud. What's next not being aloud to wear pants and be in dresses.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:704882
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.