Agnostic.com

2 2

😲😲😲

Mistranslation of Newton’s First Law Discovered after Nearly 300 Years

A new interpretation of Isaac Newton’s writings clarifies what the father of classical mechanics meant in his first law of motion

A subtle mistranslation of Isaac Newton’s first law of motion that flew under the radar for three centuries is giving new insight into what the pioneering natural philosopher was thinking when he laid the foundations of classical mechanics.

[scientificamerican.com]

Ryo1 8 Sep 6
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

I don't quite see what the fuss is about. Anyone with an elementary understanding of physics knows that the First Law describes the motion of an object in the absence of any outside force. And anyone with an elementary understanding of the universe knows that there is no such condition; no matter how minutely, every object is at the very least affected by the force of gravity, along with possibly atmospheric friction, friction from contact with a surface, collision with other objects, even dust particles. This doesn't change our understanding of Newtonian physics.

1

What's all the fuss about? In school, almost 70 years ago, we learned that forces such as gravity would alter the motion of a body, and could even cause it to move in a circle. (orbit)

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:730173
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.