Psychosocial Behavior Modification
The only problem with science is also its main benefit - that it excludes the subjective. What makes that a problem is that humans need both objective and subjective support.
So science is an amazingly valuable tool, as long as you realize it isn’t the only tool you need. But the other tool you need is in no way in conflict with science. In fact the two are each other’s best ally.
That other tool, in modern parlance, is a personal psychosocial practice. That is, a personal discipline that orients the practitioner to his/her particular social environment in a psychologically healthy way.
The reason we humans need such self-restraint is that we are now living in an environment which is increasingly different from the one we evolved to fit. We are city-apes now, and that requires that we resist some of our instincts that would be troublesome in the context of civilization.
Science can tell us the facts of the world, but it cannot modify our behavior for us. We must do that for ourselves. And that takes practice.
Believe science.
Practice psychosocial behavior modification.
I have never met anyone who actually believed that, science and subjective learning are mutually exclusive, or even that some subjective beliefs are not vital and natural. Though I do know quite a lot who believe, quite rightly to my mind, that science is of higher value, as a source of objective truth. This seems a very strange position even to attack.
But then I have never been to America, where I hear, mainly from this site, there are many strange people. Or are you straw-manning again ?
I’m not recommending “subjective belief.”
I’m happy to turn ALL belief over to science.
The subjective part is about practice - not belief.
Believe science.
Practice psychosocial behavior modification.
What was that you were saying about strawmanning?
@Fernapple
I bet it’s just a misunderstanding on either my part or yours or both, rather than anything malicious. And I bet we could talk through it carefully and clarify whatever misunderstanding there might be. And even if we see it differently, that’s allowed too. So what is this hole you think I’m in?
My post doesn’t mention “subjective learning” or characterize anything as “mutually exclusive.” Those are concepts you introduced and then argued against. In fact I made a point of saying that science and practice were “each other’s best ally.”
Where’s the hole?
@skado OK.
Your post does not mention subjective learning. "humans need both objective and subjective support." Skado.
You do not mention mutually exclusive. "as long as you realize it isn’t the only tool you need." Skado
Of course you made the point of saying that "science and practice" Skado (Subjective practice presumably.) are "each others best ally". That is what I take to be the whole point of your article, am I wrong ? Guess what, I do not disagree with any of those points. That is not what my comment is remotely about, as you will see if you read it carefully and properly. My comment is that what sort of a distortion of reality does someone have to live in, to believe that there is anybody who needs to be "told" these things. That is what I mean by straw-manning.
I solemnly await Skados next post entitled. "Why we need to take care crossing the road. For atheists who do not believe in road accidents."
So… you can’t give an example because you have no idea what I’m talking about, but you can’t be bothered to ask for clarification before stating with full confidence that:
“No I did not misunderstand you. Those two are not mutually exclusive either, and I have never still never met anyone who believed otherwise. Straw-manning me is not a way out of the hole, when you are caught in a hole stop digging.”
Don’t look now but there may be a strange person or two in the U.K. Dig on, brother!
.
I have to mostly agree on that conclusion, and an example off the top of my head that would fall under the category of subjective support would be the various political systems, and the respective political parties that individuals subscribe to.
Also, the "city-ape" thing totally describes me, being I was born in one of the biggest cities in my home state and currently reside there.