Religions are cults that are accepted. Shouldn't we fight against the ideas and policies that allow them to spread?
Shouldn't we require proof that their claims are true before we give them any allowances?
Answer guide:
My answer is 1. No, 2. Yes, 3. Yes
I am a strong believing in freedom of speech, freedom of thought, and freedom of religion. We should oppose religion through open debate. I was raised in religion and Iām the only member of my family to be an atheist. I would strongly oppose any government that wanted to imprisson my family for being religious
Simply banning religion will, I believe, achieve nothing. We need to fight the delusion on which it's based.
Yep.
Personal freedoms trump personal beliefs as long as said freedoms do not bring any physical harm to another. I would fight against someones beliefs if they were withholding medical care to heal someone by faith but I have no issue with religion as a whole.
If you are providing an "answer guide" then your stats won't be good..... Just throwing that out there
It was an example vote not an example of what vote to give.
@x0lineage0x oky doky, duly noted now
Yes, I think people have the right to make bad decisions. Allowing people to make bad decisions if they like is more fundamental to me than controlling others, as long as they do not harm others. Now (harming others) without their agreement; that's a totally different fishy kettle!
I don't think anyone knows everything, oh just a minute...there was this one guy on this site...but I've forgotten who it was now .