Agnostic.com
3 3

Archaeologists on trial for fake artifacts. I can understand the motivation, greed is the most powerful force in the Universe. Still, for archaeologists, you'd think they'd come up with better fakes. [livescience.com]

Druvius 8 Feb 9
Share
You must be a member of this group before commenting. Join Group

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

That is sad, and also dumb. For archeologists you’d hope that get their scripts chronologically correct.

Creating false archeological documentation is shocking. It can totally skew years of academic research.

Six years as rubble movers on an Egyptian tomb dig seems a more appropriate penalty. Why waste $100,000 a year on these charlatabs?

0

Fakes are wrong

bobwjr Level 10 Feb 9, 2020
1

Whether it be "religious relics" such as pieces of the original cross that supposedly Jesus was crucified upon, or the "Shroud of Turin", religion has been actively engaged in passing off artifacts as original items. Not to be outdone, Classical archaeologists have a long history of pushing the limit of scientific pedagogy by claiming items or locations purported to be proof of biblical truth.

Another problem that is equally insidious is not passing off artifacts as real, but instead, using church finances to loot and pillage prehistoric sites. Elders of the Mormon Church have, for decades, looted Mimbres prehistoric villages for Mimbres ceramics, which have brought 100's of millions of dollars to the church coffers. Their pot hunting have decimated and destroyed important archaeological sites throughout the Southwest U.S.

t1nick Level 8 Feb 9, 2020

Recent Visitors 21

Photos 292 More

Posted by JoeBKite-like structures in the western Sahara Desert.

Posted by TriphidAn Aussie Indigenous Message Stick.

Posted by TriphidIndigenous Australian Aboriginal Rock art dated somewhere between 20 and 30 thousand years old.

Posted by TriphidIndigenous Australian Aboriginal Rock art dated somewhere between 20 and 30 thousand years old.

Posted by TriphidIndigenous Australian Aboriginal Rock art dated somewhere between 20 and 30 thousand years old.

Posted by TriphidIndigenous Australian Aboriginal Rock art dated somewhere between 20 and 30 thousand years old.

Posted by JoeBDortoka vremiri: A new species of Dortokid Turtle from the Late Cretaceous of the Hațeg Basin, Romania.

Posted by JoeBThe Cabeço da Amoreira burial: An Early Modern Era West African buried in a Mesolithic shell midden in Portugal.

Posted by JoeBMusivavis amabilis: A new species of Enantiornithine Bird from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota of northeastern China.

Posted by JoeBTorosaurus in Canada.

Posted by JoeBStone tools from the Borselan Rock Shelter, in the Binalud Mountains of northeastern Iran.

Posted by JoeBDating the Lantian Biota.

Posted by JoeBBashanosaurus primitivus: A new species of Stegosaur from the Middle Jurassic of Chongqing Municipality, China.

Posted by JoeBDetermining the time of year when the Chicxulub Impactor fell.

Posted by JoeBSão Tomé and Príncipe: Possibly the last country on Earth never to have been visited by a working archaeologist.

Posted by JoeBMambawakale ruhuhu: A new species of Pseudosuchian Archosaur from the Middle Triassic Manda Beds of Tanzania.

  • Top tags#ancient #species #evidence #dinosaurs #world #animals #evolution #China #video #Australia #discovery #humans #Present #ancestors #god #Europe #university #extinction #evolutionary #relationship #birds #hope #reason #DNA #climate #earth #religious #kids #museum #book #cultural #evolved #origins #USA #friends #fish #burial #death #Antarctica #laws #genetic #Organic #mother #community #religion #Atheist #dogs #novels #Christian #truth ...

    Members 662Top

    Moderator