Your thoughts on SkidMarks desire to make vaccinations mandatory?
I'm thinking will we have a choice of "vaccination" or will that also be mandated? If that choice remains, I'll go for a Chinese or Russian version just because.
[abc.net.au]
PS Me? All medical treatment requires consent, full stop. No argument, a basic human right that you can't force "medicine" on someone. Consent is important and should be upheld and defended.
Well imo,
A) given the ravaging of Covid on the human body, the death toll it has resulted in, etc, etc, and,
B) That there is a possibility that left unchecked it can become a newer form of the 'Old Plagues' ravaged humanity centuries ago, then,
C) Adding in that ALL vaccines produced elsewhere than, China and Russia, etc, for example, MUST undergo VERY strict and prolonged, scientifically observed and run tasting procedures and trails BEFORE being given the 'All Clear,' then,
D) I, for one, WILL be lining up for my vaccination rather than risking being one those who, sadly and unfortunately, are 'pushing up daisies.'
Right. We will all be pushing up daisies soon enough, and while I'm ok as an atheist with that, I do not want to be COVIDNATED by a stupid bug. Surely a vaccine is just following the science, if the science is sound, and don't we all believe in that?
Obviously after a knighthood & internment in Westminster Abbey.
Mandate medical procedures? They already do in their greed & policies of senicide. After a certain age you can't get your hip or knee replacement. And look at how they are currently killing off the elderly.
This is also a very good article :
[abc.net.au]
Typical of the ffing Americans to steal and prevent poor countries access to the swine flu 2009 vaccine invented by Australia.
Also lots of laughter. I didn't know about the 2009 outbreak until it was over!
By the way @Powder what is happening with your flu vaccine case?
Assuming the proposed vaccine is safe, suitable for every age and type of person -- and this is unknown as yet -- why is it ok for the government to impose restrictions on movement and other respects of our liberty, based on the principle of authority to protect population, but authority to vaccinate everyone is not ok?
You have been found guilty & are now serving time at QEII's pleasure.
It is the biggest parody of Franz Kafka's "The Trial" in history - total & living histories! The pearls of wisdom (aka gobshite) coming from the mouths of medical advisors & policy makers makes a dose of Changi dysentery look like a burp on a raw prawn!
@powder My point was exactly that, that this assumption is a big one and I doubt that such a guarantee of safety for all could be given. I think the PMs position is bad politics and questionable medicine or science. I just don't think the strong negative stance on the basis on the government taking my liberty is a good one, since clearly they have taken other measures applying to everyone, unless specifically excluded for some reason. In a practical sense, however, this is going to be the problem with any vaccine: some, possibly many, will refuse, for religious, health, philosophical or ideological reasons. My question is, if they refuse and get sick, won't they still expect to go to the hospital and be cared for by publicly paid medical staff? Yes. So, it's my liberty, but help me when I get sick, is the argument. You know, the reason the government makes us wear seat belts (restricting our liberty) is that if we have an accident and not wearing a seat belt it is likely we will be more seriously hurt, requiring higher medical costs incurred (often) by government. These arguments, as a democratic socialist, I would call the social contract between public services and we as individuals.
Posted by FrayedBearThis amused me. How about you? "Don’t worry about the world coming to an end today. It is already tomorrow in Australia." Charles Shulz
Posted by FrayedBearNine chairman, and former Australian Treasurer, Peter Costello is now promoting war with China after making $millions lobbying for defence companies BY SHANE DOWLING ON MARCH 12, 2023
Posted by FrayedBearIt has taken since 1986 for the Australian Human Rights Commission to release papers & a suggested draft for incorporation into Australian law to protect all citizens.
Posted by FrayedBearIt has taken since 1986 for the Australian Human Rights Commission to release papers & a suggested draft for incorporation into Australian law to protect all citizens.
Posted by FrayedBearIt has taken since 1986 for the Australian Human Rights Commission to release papers & a suggested draft for incorporation into Australian law to protect all citizens.
Posted by FrayedBearIt has taken since 1986 for the Australian Human Rights Commission to release papers & a suggested draft for incorporation into Australian law to protect all citizens.
Posted by FrayedBearWhat a con - mRNA vaccinations?
Posted by FrayedBearWhy is the Murdoch media not widely reporting this apparent scandal that should prevent the NSW Premier being re-elected for a further 4 years?
Posted by vocaloldfartsign of the times
Posted by vocaloldfartWhat is there to say.. It is channel 9 after all.
Posted by vocaloldfart‘right to privacy’
Posted by FrayedBearAustralian Government failure on whistle blowers?
Posted by FrayedBearJust noticed that an American Company with a UK manufacturing plant has decided that Australian citizens need more sugar, protein & carbohydrates than their English market.
Posted by TriphidLeader of the Lying Narcissists Party and Opposition, Peter, Dum-Dum, Potato-head, Boofhead DUHHtton photographed here practicing for his next employment as a the first and ONLY Sub-human Flycatcher.
Posted by TriphidA little advice from M.P. Beetroot-head.
Posted by TriphidLatest from the Media photo albums, The Leaders of the Liberal-National Parties with the remains of one of their PREHISTORIC relatives.