Starting off with a denial of climate change gives me a red flag caution towards potential agenda narrative. As someone who lives in NE Ohio, and has for a large part of my life, and can clearly understand there has been a major change in our weather patterns, find this to be an insult on my intelligence. Along with an insult to many scientist who are documenting the ice melts on both ends of the globe and the effects on nature and animals in those areas.

I'm rather disappointed Anthony Fauci was left out of obvious relationship to benefiting factors and historic foreknowledge of the virus. Maybe he'll be mentioned later in the video. But if not I have to wonder why or the reasoning he could have left Fauci out being he has admitted his editing of the 201 5 hours.

While the actual ground point zero is still arguable in my opinion, and first infection, I'll suggest the transportation aspect he brings up is quite interesting when it comes to the lack of its discussion from governments and media. Using his vision of transport and pigs, it relates to a RT news report I watched yesterday that suggest that the virus might be polluting our food supply. If this is the case then we've all been exposed to the virus most likely already while it is, for what ever reason, naturally or designed, chooses its host effectively in illness.

Well, censorship as I have mentioned here works on a few different avenues. Using the US compared to China as I often do here. One is usually based on perception management towards false narratives (US) And the China syndrome I often relate to a desire to reduce the effects found in the US within a vastly larger population. The fact of the matter here in the US is that we've been under a sense of censorship from the very beginning on a collaborate agenda between the media and Trump administration. Along with a chaotic unison between the administration and its own health advisors and world health advisors, which I have argued are a purposeful means of distraction to realistic discovery that the MSCM could have initiated on its own accord.

Well the patents issue was brought up again providing an ideal opportunity to add Fauci to the story but again avoided. How does one leave such a highly prominent figure out of such an important issue?

Outside of the opening on climate change the information was interesting! Thanks for posting. I'm wondering if GNN is a news source you rely on often? Have you done any research into the source to develop a critical opinion on how reliable they can be? Why this guy used their platform as the only provider for this issue seemingly without any question? I did look into GNN and find their history of relationship with MSCM as a means to be questionable. [goodnewsnetwork.org] This Spiro Skouras seems like a decent political commentator that claims to be much like myself. However I do question his high regards for Ron Paul which is contradictory to his spoken views that miss his (Paul's) political history, in my opinion anyways.