Markel’s Royal Row, Like Spencer’s, Will Ensure Nothing Changes

What the Oprah interview does – is designed to do – is derail the intersection of class and race in politically damaging ways, writes Jonathan Cook.

[consortiumnews.com]

One need not to be a sociologist to have known how this was going to play out. She stepped out of a turbulent European racial structured construct of their manufactured US expansion right into the belly of the beast itself. When is the book and movie coming out?

{A meaningful democratic struggle prioritizes class unity as the battering ram against establishment power that long ago learnt to protect itself by dividing us through our competing identities. Class struggle does not ignore race; it embraces it and all other socially constructed identities used by power to rationalize oppression. Class subsumes them into a collective struggle strengthened by numbers.}

In other words. As I have stated here before. Racism is only another symptom of conditioning through various layers of tribalism used against us to keep us divided. While division is its main agenda, there are also levels of benefits that mostly go to the top. In this case Oprah and the media alike receive the advertisement recognitions. This can be related as an example to BLM. Where the injection of money to what is now an organization from corporations and millionaires, the media who conditionally cover it within perception management for their (BLM) affiliated politicians, comes beneficial glorification. The public is conditioned away from the real issues and the lessons that should be taught to us on sociology tribalism being used against us. That critical thought is erased.

The next phase being the most important, how the wealth of this constructed illusion is distributed. It's always about wealth and power. Above it will no doubt be within books and movies on both sides. Who gets the glorification for its publicity, then those who make the right, or wrong, statements and speeches about it. Just as how the 90 million is being distributed throughout BLM which has seen the creation of rifts in the organization from disagreements.

{Meghan’s fight for the first mixed-race British prince is no more politically progressive than the celebration by the media two years ago of the news that for the first time women were in charge of the military-industrial complex – the one that rains down death and destruction on “Third World” men, women and children.}

But for them to simply state that they have no desire to be affiliated with the Empires horrid history of colonialism, racism, and warring, in which at least one of those were clearly being interjected into their personal lives, would have been a death sentence to their financial, public life, and future careers. But all 3 are in essence related to each other which only 1 can't be mentioned alone without the other 2 coming to mind. The only remaining out for both sides was to approach it by this means for everyone to benefit. The drama has been slowly simmering in the background awaiting its address. I have little doubt this was all worked out behind closed doors. And Oprah was the perfect match maker for all.

{Murdoch — himself no fan of a British monarchy that had always looked down on him as a vulgar Australian — also understood that the inevitable soap opera quality of exceptional individuals battling the U.K.’s rigid hierarchy of privilege, spurred on by Blair’s New Labour, would prove great for sales of his newspapers. Just as Oprah knows that the only tangible consequence of the Harry and Meghan interview is that it will rake in many more millions for her own media empire.}