Hey! I'm only biased towards the truth For the love of peace,people.planet.

It's really to bad people are stuck in the illusion projected by society against RT. I say society because the majority of it has allowed main stream media set that false narrative without question! If more people would watch and get use to a few programs on there, I would argue they would get a totally different view of the world to compare to what they get from our media. And then be forced to actually sense a need for truth. Much like I'm attempting here. Putting another face on read news. Especially from what I imagine most get on their homepage.

RT offers many different aspects of people one could get comfortable watching. If they just take the time to observe a few or go over their profiles on the site. I particularly believe Rick Sanchez is one most could get comfortable with. Younger crowd with Lee Camps Redacted Tonight. Who adds a sense of comedy to his reports. Chris Hedges who is a book of knowledge in socialism, gentrification, community issues, etc. Having been a world traveler doing journalism for several years he can easily be seen as a complete source of information on any scale. Watching the Hawks is quite good. Mike Papantonio-America's Lawyer. The World According to Jesse Ventura. Who has a reputation of being a quack, but honestly does some good work. RT's news hour delivers a totally different view on world events that would likely make most main stream media faithfuls heads spin. And walk away with that rhetoric claim it's because they are a Russian station. But how do we get people to that need of sense of truth? While we have a growing number of people admitting the news is fake, they keep watching it and buying into it. It goes in line with everyone knowing our representatives have very low ratings yet they keep voting them in. How do you realize that their ratings are hovering at a meek 10% and work mostly for the interest of corporations, then keep voting them in without wanting to abandon their system by trying a 3rd party? It totally bewilders me!

@William_Mary I have firstly to state that I have never seen RT tv. I simply have the app on my phone which gives me a headline precis of the news. If I'm tempted by the headline I will read it otherwise it is left unopened. I attach FYI two photos of the current RT stream. As you can see there is bias in some headlines but is that bias anywhere near as bad as the bias shown in the Trump Pinata on this site?

@FrayedBear there's that word again, bias. Party? Fact? Agenda? I would say RT is biased towards agenda. Most of what I see on RT is on information you don't get from fake news from our MSM. Especially on their news hour. I don't know how to label that as biased if it's simply a distribution of a different style of coverage that tends to seemingly include more factual evidence. And as some of these host on their own programs will often refer to the MSM as they debunk their presentations of fact, or lack of. So agenda?

Outside of Larry King who tends to delve into the main stream media agenda quite often. Larry King has some good programs, I'll give him that. But the other night as he went into Venezuela he was obviously selling the main stream media narrative. There's a sense of bias that surely isn't Russian. If the host are equal in their rhetoric towards both parties, and rightfully against all governments practicing questionably, what are they biased towards other than agendas?

I have my own agenda here. What do you see me being biased towards? I equally dissent against both parties. I find them both to be part of a system of corruptness against the people and country. Along with the MSM. Highly suggest people put their faith in change in a 3rd party, actually the green party. Which could only be my only biased DNA. What I'm getting from you is the biased nature you see in the division of a 2 party system controlling our ability to move forward in progressing civilization. We are in deed holding the entire planet from evolving into a better state of being! But I also put the world elite in that effort, let me state. I have a hard time relating a sense of bias to agenda I guess? Should I?

@William_Mary As I originally started we all start developing our biases at birth. Even seemingly even handed reporters of all governments are in that act showing bias and will use different words for the same situation differing only because of the reporters personal bias eg. When talking about a male politician compared to a female one or say a Hispanic politician vs a WASP. I agree wholeheartedly that RT is transparent in what it reports but like Australian media and the Olympics shows more reports of Russian MMA fighters than American unless the Americans are being beaten in which case it can be by any nationality!
My own bias is that the only good politician is one dead for at least 100 years and that a two party system does not result in government for the people but the party and those monetarily supporting it.
Are you familiar with Professor Cipolla's 5 basic laws of human stupidity? [qz.com]
I have found them to be a good test of any political policy or proposed law. The point is to apply "benefit to all" literally. All does not exclude anyone.
My deceased brother did not leave me with much, we were like cat and dog, but I will always remember his quip "the day that you stop learning is the day that you die!" He was killed 20 years ago. A good friend adds the corollary "the day that you accept a fact as irrevocable is the day that you cease to be rational".

@FrayedBear that's an interesting read. Thank you.

Don't argue with stupid people. They'll beat you with experience and drag you down to their level.

@William_Mary Very true. Sadly my good nature frequently lets me down and I then get angry with myself.

I'm still trying to decide if that is sincere or sarcastic as I don't know you.