Peterson is getting a lot of air time..but is all hot air with little or no substance..it meanders..and contorts..almost like the fiction of a bible. He is unable like Hitchens demonstrated to deliver a coherent robust approach to his arguments..

The guy in the video said that we can't ignore Jordan Peterson, but he didn't give a good reason as to not. Sam Harris is giving Peterson legitimacy by debating him, while also losing fans in the meantime. Matt Dillahunty did the same thing.

I wish that we could just fast forward through all of this. I'm so tired of hearing Peterson's name.

The latest that I heard was Sam Harris talking about how Jordan Peterson gives atheists a "belief" system that the atheist community lacks and that is he continues debates with him. Sam Harris was trying to do the same thing by giving people meditation and empathy, but I guess Peterson is more captivating and people gravitate toward him more.

I don't understand all the Peterson love. He's pretentious and his sentences run-on into nothingness. I try my best to give him the benefit of the doubt and to listen but I can't understand his thought . He truly has no point of view.

Matt Dillahunty was FAR too nice to Peterson during their talk. Dillahunty is dying to rip him a new asshole, but I think he fears people turning on him and that people will stop listening the moment he criticizes Peterson.

I do wish Christopher Hitchens was alive, but I think Matt Dillahunty is the best we got in terms of atheist debaters that are ruthless and eloquent.

Blimey is the cult of Dusty still about, I unsubscribed from his channel after the big bust up he had with Matt Dillahunty about five years ago, didn't like the way he turned to public name calling.
seems to have matured a bit so I may rejoin.
thanks for the link

Jordan is an asswipe.