Substituting sets of unsubstantiated patriarchal assertions about science for similarly unsubstantiated patriarchal Daddy-religion nonsense is not acceptable. You can position an assertion as fact only if you have the data to back it up.
3
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
9 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.How did the "patriarchal" thing get in here?
AnneWimsey
Level 9
July 23, 2018
2
I brought it out to play...
Those sure were some words.
memorylikeasieve
Level 7
July 23, 2018
2
Love me my words.
Could you be more specific and less obtuse?
AlanRathburn
Level 5
July 22, 2018
1
Probably not...
Makes sense to me, but I'm stoned. Just kicked back and turned on Mat Dillahunty to watch him kick some thiestes ass.
No creo en Dios!
Boatsailor
Level 5
July 22, 2018
1
all I can think of is some old joke about daddy points and mommy points, or data points. How does that go again?
CallMeDave
Level 8
July 22, 2018
1
Base on that I can not call the unpresident of united states a billionaire. But I can call him a Traitor. Thank You Citizen Skye.
GipsyOfNewSpain
Level 9
July 22, 2018
0
You understand perfectly.
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
Share this post
Categories
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.