I'll try to interpret your question how you probably meant it. What if there was a religion that brought peace to the world but that was wrong in your opinion.
My answer would be this: I would support the moral guidance that religion brought because it obviously lead to a satisfying outcome but I would still reject the metaphysical reasoning behind that moral guidance. We would have a way to make human being behave kind to each other, but we could still convince people to act this way because we know that this would lead to peace, not because it was based in facts.
But religions divide people and stand in the way of world peace very often so that's a very unrealistic scenario.

A "theology philosophy"? Based in science? Such a thing isn't even in the realm of possibility. Theology is just agreeing on what made up things you want to believe in; science (and, largely, philosophy) couldn't be more the opposite of that. Why not just a philosophy. We have such a philosophy; it's called secular humanism. Although no philosophy is going to "bring peace to all humanity". Humanity is going to have evolve into something it's presently not, for that to happen.

I don’t actually understand this question.

It involves mushrooms for all, right?!

Hard to think of what would be required. Umm. I would say that it would be a net benefit on humanity therefore would be good in my book.

I say what ever floats your boat

Still a Fucking god!