The groups that believe in something eschatological are called religious, and are characterized as having one or more holy books, holy gatherings, exegesis of those books in sermons, rituals, containing a form of communion, a form of confession, rituals with light and singing, study groups, etc.
Then I wonder if atheists that are believers of the fact that there is no god, have to be considered as a religious group. They have gatherings in quite exclusive meetings, have testimonials and some kind of sermons, study groups trying to unify the non-belief, etc.
Both "groups" seek togetherness as together they feel stronger.
The more I think of it there are significant differences, but there are also significant similarities. Even as I attend conversation-meetings of such an (mainly) atheistic group, I keep some distance, because I want to cherish my own thinking.
Personally, I feel more comfort by non-religious or agnostic. The "I don't know, because I can't know" feels much better, and the core of my non-belief is that all religions are the same in their actions to group people to their own behalf, their own interests, their own income using magic and fairy-tales . Although I believe that a lot of religious people are sincere, honest and believe because they have been taught that way.
Religions are groupings of common beliefs and principals. Atheists and agnostics may engage in groupings just as religions do. They may even gather together on a regular basis and form an entity that the US IRS would consider to be a church. You don't need a god to engage in common spiritual fellowship. For further information on this, consult the IRS web site and download publications related to forming a church or other religious/educational tax exempt entity.
This is exactly why I’ve never liked to label myself as an atheist. If my beliefs are ever questioned, I simply say that I’m not religious. In my experience, saying you’re not religious tends to go over better than calling yourself an atheist.
Totally agree, that's what I do too.
That's actually really helpful and I never thought of it that way, Andortiz. I usually identify as an Atheist or I stay closed about it, but maybe saying non-religious would run more smoothly in conversation. However, I do not want to have non-religious sound like "I'm not religious, I'm spiritual", because sometimes that can be assumed when an non-believer says that. I don't know if that makes sense. What do you think?