Agnostic.com

2 0

The groups that believe in something eschatological are called religious, and are characterized as having one or more holy books, holy gatherings, exegesis of those books in sermons, rituals, containing a form of communion, a form of confession, rituals with light and singing, study groups, etc.
Then I wonder if atheists that are believers of the fact that there is no god, have to be considered as a religious group. They have gatherings in quite exclusive meetings, have testimonials and some kind of sermons, study groups trying to unify the non-belief, etc.
Both "groups" seek togetherness as together they feel stronger.
The more I think of it there are significant differences, but there are also significant similarities. Even as I attend conversation-meetings of such an (mainly) atheistic group, I keep some distance, because I want to cherish my own thinking.

Personally, I feel more comfort by non-religious or agnostic. The "I don't know, because I can't know" feels much better, and the core of my non-belief is that all religions are the same in their actions to group people to their own behalf, their own interests, their own income using magic and fairy-tales . Although I believe that a lot of religious people are sincere, honest and believe because they have been taught that way.

Gert 7 Jan 21
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Religions are groupings of common beliefs and principals. Atheists and agnostics may engage in groupings just as religions do. They may even gather together on a regular basis and form an entity that the US IRS would consider to be a church. You don't need a god to engage in common spiritual fellowship. For further information on this, consult the IRS web site and download publications related to forming a church or other religious/educational tax exempt entity.

2

This is exactly why I’ve never liked to label myself as an atheist. If my beliefs are ever questioned, I simply say that I’m not religious. In my experience, saying you’re not religious tends to go over better than calling yourself an atheist.

Totally agree, that's what I do too.

That's actually really helpful and I never thought of it that way, Andortiz. I usually identify as an Atheist or I stay closed about it, but maybe saying non-religious would run more smoothly in conversation. However, I do not want to have non-religious sound like "I'm not religious, I'm spiritual", because sometimes that can be assumed when an non-believer says that. I don't know if that makes sense. What do you think?

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:17134
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.