Agnostic.com

2 0

How many people agree with this? I think people would be better but the world would have less interesting history and art.

richdust 5 Jan 29
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

I love to study Religious history. As a historian one must study it. I would prefer to have studied "Human" history.

1

I can't say that I fully agree with this. I think an enormous number of downsides to religion are avoidable and we'd be better without those, and the strands of religion that foster those downsides. But I'm far from convinced that unleashing the full force of the non-insane people who are particularly susceptible to believe crazy things on true reality would be a good thing. This is among a lot of other things that religion does under the hood that are at least neutral for humanity if not beneficial.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:19478
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.