Agnostic.com

3 2

[learning-mind.com] there are many articles on this. Take time to read this and your thoughts?

HardBlues69 7 Oct 28
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Here’s a very thorough treatment. It’s hard reading and all I’ve done so far is just skimming.

[sciencedirect.com]

0

Great article! Thanks.

I think this soul that is being discussed is not some magical supernatural disembodyment but rather is natural and can be tested and studied. Roger Penrose wouldn’t be associated with woo IMO.

I have never liked the word “soul” because of how it’s taught in Christianity, but this is different. I hope to learn more, and I’ll be eagerly awaiting new developments.

0

And their ''proof'' is verified? I want photos, please, and documentation. None of this "I died and met JEEEEBUS"....

@HardBlues69 Science ''reaches conclusions" when they've PROVEN a HYPOTHESIS. Anything else is only conjecture, hardly something a real ''scientist'' would do.

It’s a work in progress. Here’s a very thorough treatment of the subject. There are testable parts to the theory, and so far things are checking out.

[sciencedirect.com]

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:210779
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.