Agnostic.com

3 1

So, I'm doing my normal Sunday morning routine of looking at pending legislation and seeing what the current status may be, and I figured I might as well see what others think as well.

On my mind lately, has been the Death with Dignity Act of 2016 that Washington, D.C. approved which "authorizes terminally ill patients to request and to be prescribed medication to end their lives." The current question for me regarding the bill in both houses named S.J.Res.4 and H.J.Res27, respectively, titled Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the Death with Dignity Act of 2016, is why is it so difficult for our elected officials (in this case uniquely R in the both the House and Senate) to even consider the concept of Death With Dignity?

Basically, the text is above, if someone is terminally ill, they can request Rx to end their lives. Yes, it is a type of suicide, I get it. Yes, it is bordering on governmental-approved euthanasia, I get it. But is it so difficult to have compassion? Empathy? The vast majority of folks in a terminally ill position are in tremendous pain and suffering. I don't see the Congress having too much of a problem calling for the heads of anyone with which they have a political problem, so it's not that they are trembling in fear of dirtying their hands.

Just wanted to put this out here and see what other folks think. If this is too much of a trigger issue for some, I apologize.

If you are good with it, please, feel free to vote and post your opinion below.

  • 15 votes
  • 0 votes
  • 0 votes
Hordo 6 Nov 4
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

Campaigned hard for this one… “Death with Dignity Act. On October 27, 1997, Oregon enacted the Death with Dignity Act which allows terminally-ill Oregonians to end their lives through the voluntary self-administration of lethal medications, expressly prescribed by a physician for that purpose.

Varn Level 8 Nov 4, 2018
1

I'd support it strategically if I were living in Washington but my guess is it likely doesn't go far enough. The law in Oregon for example insists you must have a death sentence from a doctor (in fact, IIRC, 2 different ones) that give you 6 months or less to live. Then you have to find a doctor willing to provide or administer the drugs, and I think there's some psych evaluation to insure you're not under duress, and by then I suspect 6 months are up and you're dead anyway, even assuming you had the strength and the funds and the doctors weren't booked months in advance and so forth. The law strikes me as completely insensitive to the practical realities of people who are that seriously ill.

Either that or you have intractable pain or something else that isn't actually fatal and the law is no help at all.

These laws don't constitute proper, meaningful reforms unless they are far less intrusive and restrictive of self-determination. But ... they are better than nothing. Kind of.

Why is even such a half-measure taboo to discuss? Sour grapes, if you want to condense it to a couple of words. People don't understand the distinction between rational and irrational suicide, and paint it all as irrational, or have various irrational slippery-slope concerns.

While the Abrahamic religions are behind a lot of the resistance here, even unbelievers are influenced by what has become a very strong taboo in much of the western world. It is partly dogma, but also general fear and loathing around facing and dealing with our own mortality. There are multiple reasons for the unhealthy mentality around death and dying.

The almost primal anti-suicide taboo in Christianity evolved mostly to keep Christianity from becoming a suicide cult. After all if this world is just a vale of tears and we're all heaven-bound, and all our dead loved ones are waiting for us, absent some strong taboo, why wouldn't you just off yourself as an act of faith? Might as well get on with an eternity of bliss and bypass all this earthly bullshit, right?

1

I definitely agree with what you posted.
If it's considered suicide, isn't that also an issue with insurances? Might major insurance companies try and block it?

Not likely for the Health Insurance companies...it saves them money in the long run. For the Life Insurance companies, I know that as long as it's after the first two years of the policy (the time required by the Suicide Clause) they will have to pay out, so I foresee another clause, possibly, being added to life insurance policies regarding this.

*source is nothing more than my experience and knowledge as a licensed insurance agent (not appointed as yet, and I'm definitely not going back to that as a job) and my continuing education for maintaining my license and that I was an agent and executive in a Life/Health company for a while.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:215396
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.