Where does he mention holocaust?
Of interest however is the clipping from Beaverbrook's 1933 newspaper. Beaverbrook, a Canadian of Scottish Presbyterian background, was described in 1962 by Prince Phillip as follows: " In March 1962, Beaverbrook was attacked in the House of Commons for running "a sustained vendetta" against the British Royal Family in the Express titles. In the same month, the Duke of Edinburgh described the Express as "a bloody awful newspaper. It is full of lies, scandal and imagination. It is a vicious paper." At the height of Beaverbrook's control, in 1948, he told a Royal Commission on the press that he ran his papers "purely for the purpose of making propaganda". The arrival of television and the public's changing interests took their toll on circulation." Wikipedia. It sounds like the Express was a forerunner of the media outlets berated now by many in America and Russia.
The question therefore surely is "did Beaverbrook and his publication result in exacerbating Nazi behaviour toward the Jews"? Or as is suggested elsewhere the holocaust was a necessary tool in Zionist ambitions to obtain an Israeli state. One has also got to question the sanity of demanding Israel when a large tract of Western Australia was offered?

@FrayedBear didn’t know about the WA thing. If I were a Zionist I’d have to go for Israel. It’s where Solomon and David et al. set to work making theit Abrahamic religion centre stage. Probably the outback of WA doesn’t have quite the same allure!?