Agnostic.com

3 2

I did not know that.

[stuff.co.nz]

Kohelath 6 Feb 3
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

I did know that.

2

Very interesting. I didn't know that either. And nowadays, many Roman Catholics would consider that very form of contraceptive as 'killing babies", unnatural, and against god's will.

Twatts, is all they are. They think that the ovulation cycle is the one and only birth prevention that is ok, well in my eyes it is no different, after all you are preventing the fertilization of the egg.

@Jolanta Yes, their attempts to distinguish 'natural' methods from 'artificial' methods do make you question what other scientific advances they'd be willing to do without since they aren't 'natural'. If they really want to live a literally biblical life, so many technological advances would be rejected, right? The cherry picking drives me nuts. It gets to be the point where an unborn fetus has more rights than the mother...personhood rights.

1

Awesome story while eating pasta with tomato sauce. Just saying that a little better heads up would’ve been great.?

Lol

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:280563
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.