Agnostic.com

1 0

Is Distance / Depth An Illusion?

In any video or computer game, "what if" science research simulation, or even training exercise in virtual reality, while there is a left-right and top/up-bottom/down dimension, there is no front-back, only the illusion of front-back that gives the player or viewer or trainee the perception that they are interacting in a totally 3-D 'world' although they are really viewing a 2-D 'world', something that's quasi-holographic.

But no doubt to the characters part and parcel of these game simulations, if they could tell you, they'd tell you their virtual world was indeed a 3-D world, albeit we know it's not.

That seems to be rather analogous to the current cosmological idea that our universe is an actual hologram - the Holographic Universe principle. On a cosmic scale there is no real depth to the Universe, just the illusion of one. You look at the Universe and see from your perspective left-right and top-bottom but do you really see a cosmic front-back?

You could say well that light has taken ten years to reach us from that star we think is ten light-years away from us and therefore that light has obviously travelled in a back to front manner (back being the star; the front being us). But there's no little sign on that starlight's photons that says "I've been travelling for ten of your years just to meet and greet you".

If we are beings in an actual Holographic Universe, then depth is illusionary in the same way that depth is illusionary to our virtual reality characters.

2-D images masquerading as 3-D:

*Holograms.

*Any TV / movie / YouTube videos, etc. images, which we 'see' as 3-D but in reality on a 2-D monitor so in reality there is no depth.

*Characters in video games appear to move backwards and forwards but they really don't. What would be their point of view though I wonder? Is there virtual reality landscape 3-D from their point of view?

*A planetarium can show the expansion of the Universe but it's just a projection on a 2-D surface.

*A dream may appear as 3-D but it is of course 2-D.

100% of everything you have ever seen, are seeing now and ever will see in the future is actually perceived or experienced in the brain. You might think that you reside inside the Universe, but in a very real way the Universe resides within you (you being defined as your mind-set that's encoded within your brain). Since the Universe cannot literally fit inside your skull, your brain has to do some sleight-of-hand 'magic' act to get the external Universe inside of your head. Your perception of life, the Universe and everything may seem to be life-sized and 3-D but it is really shrunk down to something mind-sized and 2-D. It's kind of seems like there is a little person sitting down inside your brain watching the movie you are constructing through your senses in real time. But maybe all was really 2-D from the get-go.

Obviously you see 2-D images (i.e. - holograms, TV pictures, paintings with depth perception, etc.) in your mind as 2-D even if you perceive those images as 3-D. So, if life, the Universe and everything were in reality 2-D, your mind would see those images as 2-D albeit perhaps while still perceiving a 3-D illusion.

johnprytz 7 Mar 1
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Okay, so walk on up to a phone pole, fast. Then let me know how it went.....

@johnprytz pain, you forgot pain. Also, video games do not find the players in ER's, duhhhhhhh

@johnprytz yes they could, but it would slow down the action & be very unpopular egg with the players, because the entire point of video games is violence/action. Unlike real life, where actual actions have actual consequences. Trying to meld the 2 is a waste of time and especially would spoil the video game(s).

@johnprytz really? Even Centipede, my favorite back in the day, was violent, altho pretty colors......

@johnprytz watched the David Susskind video. Can only say that my life experiences and deep leanings have me convinced that the longer & more complicated an explanation is, the Less likely it is to be (completely) true. Sort of like "grasping at straws" because our minds need/crave/ require "something" rather than "aaaargh! nothing!?". Which also explains the tenacity of religious belief in the face of common sense!
It appears to me there needs to be another school of thought, Susskind waffled A Lot about holograms.

@johnprytz not going to any video store...spend Plenty of time with Angry Birds Tournaments, ranked top 5% in the world.
Much rather hear your thoughts on my comment about Susskind's video!

@johnprytz yes, Leonard, duhhhh....

@johnprytz well, okay I guess, But what difference does it make?

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:300807
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.