Agnostic.com

1 0

The Bible As A Work Of Historical Fiction.

According to Wikipedia, "Fiction is the classification for any story or universe derived from imagination - in other words, not based strictly on history or fact. ... Fiction constitutes an act of creative invention, so that faithfulness to reality is not typically assumed; in other words, fiction is not expected to present only characters who are actual people or descriptions that are factually true. The context of fiction is generally open to interpretation, due to fiction's freedom from any necessary embedding in reality; however, some fictional works are claimed to be, or marketed as, historically or factually accurate, complicating the traditional distinction between fiction and non-fiction."

Further, "Realistic fiction typically involves a story whose basic setting (time and location in the world) is real and whose events could feasibly happen in that real-world setting; non-realistic fiction involves a story where the opposite is the case, often being set in an entirely imaginary universe, an alternative history of the world other than that currently understood as true, or some other non-existent location or time-period, sometimes even presenting impossible technology or a defiance of the currently understood laws of nature."

Reasons why the Bible most certainly appears to be and probably is a work of historical fiction.

#1) The Bible reads as if it is a series of rather unconnected self-contained short stories. Examples could include the Garden of Eden, the Flood, Sodom & Gomorrah, the Tower of Babel, Abraham & Isaac, etc. Each seems to be a self-contained story.

#2) There's no independently verified historical / archaeological evidence that is contemporary with Biblical times that any of the major players in the Bible (i.e. - Adam & Eve, Noah, Moses, Jonah, Solomon, David & Goliath, etc.) ever existed and that any of the major events (i.e. - the Flood; the Exodus; the Battle of Jericho, etc.) that are related ever happened.

#3) Many of the Biblical tales are wildly improbable at best (i.e. - the Garden of Eden narrative; the Exodus, etc. and often downright scientifically impossible (i.e. - the creation of life (especially of Adam & Eve), the Universe and everything; Jonah and the 'whale'; the Sun standing still in the sky; the resurrection, etc.).

#4) Like nearly all works of fiction, the Bible contains many hundreds of dialogues and monologues without any explanation (adequate or otherwise) as to who was Johnny-on-the-spot writing down these pithy quotations in real time. Some of these Biblical quotations could only have been scribed down by Peeping Toms or spies and some quotations are noted and logged before any humans even existed that could have wrote them down!

Regarding Bible Quotations: And just who would have even thought to be writing all of these monologues and dialogues down at the time, even assuming that some unknown scribe was Johnny-on-the-spot and just happened to have pen-and-paper (or equivalent) at the ready?

johnprytz 7 Mar 16
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Some of the Bible is well-established history, like the Dual Monarchy era. We know that from independent sources, though even there, one has to be cautious.

Consider Sennacherb's siege of Jerusalem in 701 BCE. We have a stele prepared by some of his propagandists. What does it say? It brags about conquering lots of towns, except for Jerusalem. About Jerusalem, it describes bringing back lots and lots of loot and keeping the city's king holed up in it like a caged bird. Evidently stories of triumph to cover up failure, like some ancient Baghdad Bob. In the Bible, we also find that the siege failed, and that an angel zapped the Assyrian soldiers. Seems like some of them had gotten sick from some disease spreading among them. [en.wikipedia.org]

Yes it is not as simple as pure fiction, after all it does not come from any one source. I think that the nearest equivalent would be a scrap book of press cuttings, made by several people over a long period. Some fact, some fiction, some letters, some news reports, some scholarly history, bit of poety etc. You may confirm some bits half confirm others and guess at the most part.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:311657
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.