Religious fundamentalists and many of today’s atheists share the same approach to texts. They read them directly and literally, ignoring the single most important fact about a sacred text, namely that its meaning is not self-evident. It has a history and it has to be interpreted.
Totally! Early writers wrote parables within parables within parables. Once you understand that, the Bible becomes an impressive feat of storytelling. Just imagine how impressive that would seem to simple people.
Interpretation? The writers were crystal clear about what they were trying to say. Look at the temple merchants parable.
Quite so. I suggest that one of the things we forget is that up until a few hundred years ago teaching was done by the oral tradition and stories were used as vehicles for knowledge. Homily and allegory were employed to get the point across whether it be religious or cautionary tales. This is why the work of the Grimm Brothers in the context of European social history is important and highlights examples of a line of centuries of folkic oral transmission
The problem with calling them parables instead of actual events is that makes the Bible secular. I don't have a problem with using parts of it for moral input but kind of eliminates it as a piece of any religion.