The only problem I have with this article is his characterizing other critics of creationism as attacking straw men set up by the creationist. Without explanation he probably needs to stick to his script and debunk the creationists which he does pretty effectively. Most other critics that I've observed handled it well. He just came off a little too know-it-all at the beginning and it soured the article for me. Otherwise his points seem accurate. As to what I think of this irony, it's pretty par for the course with creationism, they have absolutely no evidence and try to prove their point by either attacking geology or more commonly evolution with nonsense. The problem is the number of people that listen to creationists and won't allow their children to even examine the real evidence.

Good points! My opinion is that it's just another moment in the life of idiotic theists who don't even realize why we're all laughing our bums off! This is the perfect end to a ridiculous effort to exploit 2000 years of DOGMA.