Agnostic.com

10 1

I find a lot of "God doesn't exist (rage and hate)!". I can not stay like a tree and watch that! Foolishness blinds, therefore unable to see the problem. Forcein' hate as a self-defense because actually still like and/or love, in this case religion. On the further that hate is forcing to avoid and attack, in this case religion, just like Hitler did to Jews, as I "know" he was "half" Jew and he has a problem of affiliation, didn't knew where he belongs, he wasn't able to understand that there is no grid anywhere outside the human mind, and you will brain-deadly do wrong and bad things just to feed that hate and fake independence. If you want to share your awesome discovery that "God doesn't exist!" don't! There are already tons of brain-deads who do share. If you however do have to say it as a goal of explainin' and tellin' somethin' else, tell that with smile, simple put smile at the end and don't use "God" but "Supreme" that way you are giving honor, credits, respect, whatever, to awesome propaganda "Religion" that you are born from, since "God" is somewhat taboo world. You can go like "There is no Supreme..." and probably in some neighbor sentences add "haha πŸ™‚" to make sure you are lookin' nice and that you are tellin' that easy, showing that you aren't part of that, because just people who are part of something have troubles with it, including troubles talking about it, trying to fool others and themselves that they are not part because they clearly attack it, actually they are doin' opposite than they think they are doin'. Try to not be so stupid. I am completely calm, that's why I am able to write this "offensive" texts, because, to explain the last time but the most clear for people who won't "get it" by themselves, if you want to be a bad you must be a good. If you want doin' incorrectly, you must know how to do correctly, if you however don't know how to do correctly, mention that and you are again free to do incorrectly, but try to improve. When you know correct you have much better picture, therefore, mostly, you can peacefully chose the right thing, so if you still chose to do incorrectly that means you have a good enough reason, and no one with this "politics" (or "logic", or the way of thinking, or whatever) should make any problems about you doing incorrectly. This "politics" is not about making a good and working society, that comes alongside with the results, but rather to make each individual better, mainly wise, because wisdom is, as I believe, how good is knowledge used, and no doubts humans lack the very most, not anything else ever but, wisdom. My English is terrible.

InSaNe_97 4 June 24
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

10 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

Was that English?

That was damned near perfect English jumbled to make it look like a secondary language. As LenHazel pointed out below. Perfect punctuation too. Much better than mine.

@freeofgod , it was word vomit.
I'm not fond of arm-chair-diagnoses but that is sort of how schizophrenics ramble.

2

What are you ranting about?

2

????

bobwjr Level 10 June 24, 2019
4

As someone who has voluntarily taught English as a second language for years to a variegated melange of ethnicities, I have to wonder how it is that some one who claims their English to be terrible, can in reality spell and use correctly 4 syllable words, punctuate efficiently and yet can feign ignorance by correctly using a replacement apostrophe for a dropped G on the suffix "ing" and leave out pronouns in order to write "in dialect"

I call Bull crap.

3

Nobody wants to read a wall of words.

Use punctuation, short sentences and paragraph breaks.

Wincing at your giant block of text, I did not read it. Try again.

I read the first several lines. You missed nothing.

3

hmmmmm

2

Problem with your thesis is you write as if religion is merely a theoretical issue to be dealt with over coffee, like arguing string theory. But religion is a weapon used to destroy the rights of others and impose its will, whether sharia or it's cousin, Ivangelicalism. Agnostics/atheists treating its adherents politely would be like Jews treating the Gestapo politely.

I do partially agree, I really love first sentence, for someone who don't have a professional deformation that sounds professional. I don't like though that everyone catch "religion" as main topic here, no that's not a main topic, main topic is... well, I wrote it in text, religion is just an example, just like Hitler was. I didn't tell any bad or good thing about religion nor Hitler, although I believe Hitler don't need to be called bad since it's a well-known thing, aside from that religion is still a messy topic I do not want to argument about since people do not listen. You know people don't want to hear your mind, they just want to hear their mind comin' from your mouth. That makes Me partially sad.

@InSaNe_97 , WTF???

3

Ummm, what?

Yep...we people don’t understand the text. Lmao

3

I understood the last phrase...

I clearly wrote everythin'. Ah. Not sure how you people don't understand the text.

Sorry I didn’t mean to be rude, but maybe you shouldn’t try so hard...Sometimes less is more.
Ps. My English is far from perfect too.

@InSaNe_97 First of all...If you are against hate, you shouldn’t come in this group of atheists, comparing us to Hitler and trying to defend religions, most of which are trying to eliminate atheists since before those stupid books. Now...the fact that your English is not perfect (so isn’t mine), and you’re still trying to use big words to sound smart, but results are deceiving you, means that you can write your β€œoffensive” texts for β€œend of hate” and still be considered, as your name suggests... just InSaNe. Capisce?
Which religion or god are you defending so aggressively again?

I din't mention Agnostic community. Where did you read that?
I don't compare people to Hitler. Where did you read that? I did compared hate people have to same hate Hitler had.
I am not trying to defend religion. Where did you read that?
I am not trying using big word to sound smart. Where did you read that? I am using big word to describe.

3

I've read through this 2 times and am not understanding the point...can someone please summarize?

Wait a sec, I will extract it from the text.

Edit: Basically people are feeding hate by attacking (hate-speech, ragin', etc...) something they are tryin' to be independent from but can't because that's not the way it works. They are forcing themselves to do the wrong and bad things, much times against logic, reason and justification just to "shit" on that, doing with closed mind slowly habituate mind to be closed, and it goes nowhere good. I just tell stop doing that "hate" nonsense and with that I explained why.

It's a wall of nonsense written by someone off their meds.

@Lovemylife, Summary: TROLL.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:364938
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.