7 9

I'm just passing through again, but I have a little luggage to drop off here for your perusal.

This (the Fox News thing) was posted by a friend of mine. It was followed by a couple of ignorant and prejudiced comments. I found it unacceptable and responded with the following:

...speaking of knowledge vs hearsay, there is nothing in the law that says an immigrant seeking asylum has to do so at a port of entry. Further, they have up to a year after entry (wherever they entered) to file for asylum. Due process says they must be scheduled for a hearing and it says nothing about being detained, caged, or separated from family. This is bullshit, [name deleted]. I have lived with this law for over 30 years, have dealt with immigrants, including my own family. I have a wife who is a legal resident, one of my daughters is a naturalized citizen. I began the legal process to get my son up here in 1999. It is now 2019. That, if my math is correct, comes out to 20 years following the 'process'.

It should also be pointed out that the US is not the top country on a per capita basis when it comes to immigrants entering the country and seeking asylum. But first, let's look at what the law says as opposed to what Homan said:

A foreign national who seeks asylum in the United States may do so either affirmatively or defensively.[4] An affirmative asylum seeker is physically present in the United States. This person must apply for asylum within one year of his arrival in the United States.[5] He may be undocumented, living in the United States without status, or may have entered the U.S. on a visa which will soon expire.[6]

The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services reviews affirmative asylum claims through a non-adversarial interview with an asylum officer at one of eight offices nationwide. The affirmative asylum seeker requests asylum by completing an I-589 Application, which asks for personal information about the seeker and her family and for the grounds of asylum, whether she has ever experienced “harm or mistreatment or threats,” whether she “fears harm or mistreatment” if forced to return home, whether she’s been imprisoned or detained in countries outside of the United States and other questions.[7] By answering these questions, the asylum seeker can demonstrate that she is not barred from asylum for any of the reasons listed in the immigration laws.

After interviewing the applicant, the asylum officer may grant the asylum status or refer the applicant to immigration court for removal proceedings, where she may pursue the application for asylum before an immigration judge.

A defensive asylum applicant is a person who is apprehended after entering the United States at a border and applies for asylum while the threat of removal by the Department of Homeland Security looms.[8] An applicant must be in removal proceedings in immigration court to request asylum in this manner. The application is the same, but the asylum seeker must file his application with the immigration court with jurisdiction over the applicant’s case. The applicant must show that persecution is more probable than not if he is forced to return home.

"...many other countries are much more accepting of asylum seekers than the United States is. In fact, the United States ranks 50th in the world in net increase in asylees, refugees, and people in similar situations as a share of its population since 2012."


I suggest you read the article in its entirety. You might just learn something. Perhaps reading the law would help, too. In the past two years I have seen more ignorance displayed on this subject than on most others combined. I'm also seeing a lot of prejudice coming from people I thought knew better.


evidentialist 8 July 18

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account


Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.



bobwjr Level 10 July 18, 2019

Thank you for posting.
Facts may not mean much to some, but they ARE important.

Yes, ma'am, that they is.


If you took all of the illegals out of Texas, it would take you years and cost you even more to get a house built. It would cripple our economy.

@Sticks48 -- That it would, bro, that it would.




Just like Brexit - people believe the easy lies instead of checking the facts. It's an emotional thing, but they need to try to rationalise it in some way.

Gareth Level 7 July 18, 2019

This is a little luggage? 🙂

@St-Sinner -- Yeah, I guess it is a bit more than carry on, isn't it?

@evidentialist You dropped it good.


The hidden agenda of not wanting people of color to come to this country is buried in the spread of misinformation about the law...

Thanks for posting...I, too, am a naturalized American and proud to be here in my country.

@thinktwice -- And where might that have been, young lady?

@evidentialist I am half Japanese...and,hence your confusing this old lady for a young one...although, I am almost 66 years young indeed!

@thinktwice -- To me, most of the ladies represented here are young ladies. You are no exception to that.

In my work I have visited Japan many times, though usually just passing through on my way to Korea and Taiwan. It is a lovely and interesting country with an incredible history worthy of a lifetime of study. Anyway, I'm glad you decided to come here.

Oops, forgot to mention that my daughter and her family are heading for Japan in August. They are really excited to find out if what I have told them is true. 🙂

@thinktwice you don't look it beautiful

@bobwjr -- Oh, damn, I thought you were talking about me. I'm crushed.

@evidentialist sorry don't go that way lol

@bobwjr -- Neither do I, but it would be nice for someone, anyone to comment positively regarding my appearance. So far, no luck.

@evidentialist They will have a lovely time! I will probably go back in 2020 on my way to Australia. I really could use some REAL sushi...ha ha ha

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:375874
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.