Agnostic.com

2 1

"Study after study, index after index, shows that internally the United States mirrors the world externally. For education, wealth, health, and life expectancy, it is better to live among the infidels than among the true believers.

"What is the causal connection? Does theism depress life, or does an elevated life lead to non-belief? Social scientists are all over the map on this. There is some evidence to support a common-cause explanation — education leads to both societal success and diminished belief. The strongest trends, however, are toward societal benefits leading to non-belief rather than conversely."

(From Michael RUSE: "Atheism" )

Matias 8 Aug 22
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

2

By lumping everyone in a geographical area together and taking averages there might be some unwarranted conclusions being drawn. In this Pew study you can see that those who report “nothing in particular” as their religion are not particularly well off. They are about as wealthy as Catholics and Southern Baptists but are far out-ranked by many religious groups. Even atheists and agnostics are not as wealthy as four religious groups.

[pewresearch.org]

“Does theism depress life?” What a loaded question! Religious people in general are not striving for great wealth but for a good life based on spiritual rewards. Just how wealthy do you want people to be? Surely there must be some balance. If theism depressed life theism would have been eliminated from the human experience ages ago. Based on empirical evidence it appears that theism enhances life.

Using my county as an example, from my perspective it appears that those who are industrious and who have an ample amount of wealth are those who belong to a church. Those who are poor and rely on government programs are generally not interested in religion. Because this is an agricultural area, average income is somewhat below the national average—at the same time, since there’s less social and cultural diversity people tend to be conservative, sticking with their traditional religion. You could look at the statistics and draw the conclusion that religion causes poverty or that poverty causes religion, but that conclusion is totally unjustified IMO.

People who practice religion don't do so for material benefit, in fact a lot of organized religions try to give hope to those who are poor, and facilitate charity. So it doesn't make any sense that there should be any correlation at all.

There has to be another factor that links the two, and I would say education is the prime suspect. There is a weak negative correlation between religious belief, and a strong positive correlation between higher education and net worth. These things combined could lead to the observation of a connection between the three without necessarily indicating any causation.

1

What if they are thinking about this backwards?

A lot of people describe faith as a spiritual need, and treat it as a way to get through the day when reality is unfavorable.

A poor or oppressed person should be more likely to require that spiritual need to keep going, and because it isn't a beneficial use of time it keeps them poor, thus a cycle of regression to mediocrity ensues.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:392218
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.