Should fidelity between cohabitating couples be absolute, or should absolute sexual fidelity be more lax - for both of them.
After all, the latter was initially insisted upon by the Christian Church, as a means of keeping track on Christian offspring and reducing the chance of incest, which was known to produce defects, even if the mechanism was a mystery.
I couldn't be with someone who wanted to be with other women, but that's just me. I'm up front about that in all my potential relationships. If a man wants to date other women and me, fine. But once sex is in the picture, I don't like to share.
This post isn't about continually "wanting to be with other sexual partners." It's really to do with something that happens more often than most people will admit, the odd "fling" by either partner. Is it really such a big deal? I would find it a greater offence if one treated one's partner as second best, and vice versa.
What ever floats ya boat as they say . But personally I wouldn't be comfortable with it not sure if it's ego or self esteem but I just couldn't handle it . However those that I have seen in the relationships not many last as it tends to be one more into it than the other . Some have claimed this as manipulative behaviour sometimes abbusive. Into only seems to work when both are on equal grounds
There's a polyamory group you may like. whatever two people agree ion should be honored.
My wife would be adamantly against it, even though I would be open. This question is more on the morals of the occasional infidelity and the church attitude to it.
@Petter It's not moral or ethical if you're breaking an agreement.
I've had a look. It seems interesting. Thanks