Agnostic.com

2 2

An overlooked element of the ventilator debate - maybe they don't do much anyway? Or too little too late for those who reach that point?
[physiciansweekly.com]

Allamanda 8 Mar 31
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

If one reaches the point of needing a ventillator, one is extremely ill, and therefore more likely to die.
Very often, had a patient been given a CPAP device, the patient would not have progressed to needing a ventillator.
A ventillator is a last ditch device to save a life. Too many people equate it to being a magic cure.

0

I don't think that's what this guy is getting at. He cites the UK study as showing 66% on ventilators died, meaning 34% lived. Although he doesn't say it, I think the implication is that data on the ones who died needs to be more available, so triage decisions can be better guided, if it comes to that. That is, some patients might be better helped with a ventilator, and others not, and having data to figure out which is which would help with triage.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:478174
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.