Aside from divestment, we also have shareholder activism: large investors, recognizing that many of them are US-based and US-focused in their investments, and recognizing that we are in a situation where we have had an unprecedented broad daylight unacceptable outrageous attempt to end the rule of law in the US, and that some aspects of this are still unapologetically ongoing, and recognizing the extraordinary role in these attempts of some of the companies these investors have invested in, should initiate binding shareholder proposals, as soon as possible, to remove management which fails to remove on-air talent which has supported the insurrection, or which has supported the big lie of a stolen 2020 Presidential Election.

For instance:
Ignoring for a moment the German investor, we have Blackrock (world's largest asset manager) as the other single biggest shareholder of "iHeart Media", which is actually the old reconstituted (infamous to some of us) "ClearChannel"
[finance.yahoo.com]

Investors in ESG and Impact funds which purport to make a social and governance difference, and who are concerned about the fact that the US Government at Federal and State levels is the target of such dastardly efforts, should expect that some of these funds will, on their behalf, and in-keeping with the themes of some of the funds, introduce shareholder measures of the type described above. If Blackrock has any such funds, or if it purports to apply some basic governance criteria to all of its funds, then it is arguable that it should be introducing such measures.

As to the German investment firm, I haven't figured that one out yet. As well, for iHeart Media, it doesn't show up conveniently on the link I gave, but a major shareholder (perhaps through some other financial instruments such as warrants) is elements of the Liberty Media/Group, and those also are quoted, and so can be the subject of much the same sort of campaign.

iHeart Media provides a radio platform for the likes of Beck, Hannity, Savage, Levin, et. al. If any of those radio hosts have been guilty of supporting the insurrection or of promulgating the stolen election nonsense, then let's see some shareholder efforts to remove them from those radio stations, immediately.

We see, literally, thousands and millions of person-hours expended by folks like us on the internet, concerned about the dastardly attempt to undermine the rule of law in the US, but I have not seen a single internet poster, other than myself, try to organize folks to
a) zoom in the role of these radio and tv personalities in providing very strong support for that effort.
b) attempt to leverage the shareholder/impact investing angle.

I'm disappointed in the impact investing community that they have so far not risen more quickly to the occasion. Probably eventually they will get around to it en masse. It may already be too late, and almost certainly will be too late by the time we see them come together.

And yes, divestment is also an angle, but there is more than one angle that can be pulled here.

@kmaz I'm not big on divestment. I will boycott My Pillow, haven't been buying Goya products, wouldn't set foot in a Hobby Lobby.