Agnostic.com

1 2

Fox News Host Humiliated by Jen Psaki when He can't Answer Her Simple Question.

nogod4me 7 Apr 5
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

No humiliation at all. Her response is called "flipping the answer". The response proves nothing either way.

And still Peter Doocy is a lame-ass tool.

@nogod4me Your initial post and your response shows a prejudicial leaning, so you just continue to fool yourself.

@Alienbeing I see you have already fooled yourself. Peter Doocy has been shown to be a lame-ass tool quite often.

@nogod4me I never hinted that I liked or disliked Doocy. I did say your actions show a bias. You show that bias again in your last reply by suggesting something that was not even indicated.

@Alienbeing How childish. Fox News targets believers, racists, fascists, white nationalists, the ignorant, haters, conspiracy theorists, etc., as their primary audience. Obviously, they ask loaded and baited questions to try to get a "GOTCHA" answer. They are just lame-ass tools.

I love the way Jen Psaki humiliates Doocy by flipping the answer of his baited question back on him. Even though this is extremely simple it seems that it is too sophisticated for you to understand.

@nogod4me Kindly advise how my reply can in any manner, be described as "childish".

While not childish, your last reply does AGAIN show remarkable bias. Now you rant about FOX as if I ever endorsed that network or anyone on it. I did not. If you took the time to review my prior posts you wold have seen I don't put much faith in what FOX or MSNBC or CNN says. Therefore your remark is obviously based solely on your bias.

As for your self rewarding last sentence, I'd am sure my education compares very favorably with yours.

Thank you for illustating my case so well.

@Alienbeing You seem to recognize the bias, but you fail to recognize the origin. Fox News asks biased, baited, loaded questions, not to get information, but for "GOTCHA" answers. Turning those answers around on them is not bias. Jen Psaki does a great job of humiliating Doocy.

I hope you would also be bias against those who push lies rather than those who do not. You admit that you don't put much faith in what FOX says, that is because you are bias.

@nogod4me You can't help reading YOUR thoughts into what you read.

Yes, FOX does ask baited questions. SO DOES MSNBC & CNN.

Your last sentence is at best a poor conclusion, and probably only another example of the fact that you read your toughts into what you read. I did say I don't put much faith in FOX (among other networks). That in NO way even suggests a bias. In fact since I listed other stations along with FOX if CLEARLY shows no bias, rather it says that many stations slant their programming.

Look at yourself and stop reading your bias into what others write.

@Alienbeing So, when I don't put much faith in what FOX says, that makes me bias, but when you don't put much faith in what FOX, MSNBC, or CNN says, that "CLEARLY shows no bias"

You are just being a contentious dweeb. Piss Off!

@nogod4me No your last reply is not correct in any way. Lack of faith does not in itself indicate prejudice.

Go backto sleep.

@Alienbeing If Fox News told the truth and never gave a reason to distrust them, then it would be prejudice because it is derived from an unfounded opinion. However, Fox News has proven itself to be extremely manipulative, dishonest, and bias. Only an idiot would put their trust in them. Just because I know about their dishonesty and make it known does not make me bias.

In your judgment, when I have a lack of faith in Fox News it's negative bias in your mind, but when you have a lack of faith in Fox News it is positive bias, and is not really bias. That is just prejudice, stupid, and hypocritical, you don't know me.

You are a hypocritical, contentious dweeb. Piss Off! Crawl back in your hole or back to Church where you belong.

@nogod4me You continue to harp on FOX News as is you must prove something to me. I already said FOX, and other networks are bias, so why are you beating a dead horse?

The second paragraph of your 4/11 reply is false. I never said that merly because you lack faith in FOX news you were prejudice. OBVIOUSLY, (since, as I already said) I too think FOX presents bias view points I could NOT hold that view.

Your replies continue to show you are bias and your "piss off" childish notations show you are juvenile. Those two fact combie to make your opinion irrelevant ot any discussion.

@Alienbeing You are irrelevant. You think your opinion matters when it does not, I couldn't care less about what you believe. You call me bias and that my comment and the initial post (which I simply shared and did not write) has a prejudicial leaning, even though you yourself admit that you also do not put faith in Fox and other news outlets.

As I said before, but you are too stupid to understand, you don't know me. You accuse me of bias, when I have a legitimate reason to reject Fox News. And, as I said before, but you are too stupid to understand, bias from prejudice is derived from an unfounded opinion. Fox News has proven itself unreliable and untrustworthy. They have a reputation for dishonest reporting and outright lies. You don't trust them, and neither do I. You are trying to project onto me your prejudiced opinion of how I feel about Fox News, which is childish.

Take this to heart, you are a childish, prejudice, hypocritical, contentious dweeb. Piss Off! Go and probe your own ass, crawl back in your hole or back to Church where you belong.

@nogod4me Being irrelevant to you is a compliment. As far as stupid, it is YOU, not I that resorts to insult and clearly shows you have a bias by reading that bias into everything you read. I'd gladly compare my education to yours at any time. For perhaps the forth tine I restate that the mere fact that you criticize FOX is NOT, repeat NOT the reason you illustrate bias. The fact that you retreat to that position with each of your replies clearly shows a lack of reading comprehension. To then go on to criticize FOX EVEN AGAIN shows your lack of reading comprehension.

You failed to note that in my most immediate repy to you I said "I never said that merly because you lack faith in FOX news you were prejudice. OBVIOUSLY, (since, as I already said) I too think FOX presents bias view points I could NOT hold that view." That is a direct quote from above even with the typo I made.

You are so prejudice you live in a haze.

Buzz off.

@Alienbeing Then please, let me compliment you again, you are irrelevant. Your stupidity is not an insult, it's a fact and observation. It's not your fault you cannot understand that you are stupid and cannot understand the meaning of words.

I have a legitimate reason to reject Fox News. And, as I said before, but you are too stupid to understand, bias from prejudice is derived from an unfounded opinion. It is not prejudice to reject proven disinformation and those who push it, it is smart, but I see you are too stupid to understand even that simple fact.

Take this to heart, you are a stupid, childish, prejudice, hypocritical, contentious dweeb. Piss Off! Go and probe your own ass, crawl back in your hole or back to Church where you belong.

@nogod4me I was not referring to your "stupid" comment when I said you resort to attempts at insult. AGAIN you prove you can't read. By the way I said "attempts" because your opinion is worth nothing.

The remainder of your reply is so childish I'll cap everything by saying GROW UP.

If you ever have something nearing intelligence to say, let me know. Now you can return to sucking your thumb.

@Alienbeing You know what you can suck!

@nogod4me I reviewed your bio. I note that when asked about education your response was "other". From your childish replies one must conclude that the "other" is you dropped out of school after 4th grade. That probable fact is illustrated by your level of reading comprehension.

Last, no, I don't what what I can suck, but I'm sure you know what to suck.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:659278
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.