The Conundrum of an omnipotence, omnipresence and omniscience Being...
The Conundrum of an omnipotence, omnipresence and omniscience Being In and of itself is an oxymoron. It belies the first and most important first law of logic. "What is true cannot be false and at the same time.
If the three above qualities define your god than your god cannot exist, simply because it is a term full of contradictions. The mere fact that such a being can be define in and of itself means that it has limitations.
To define anythings means it has certain properties that distinguishes it from other things which means in it of itself makes it exclusive. and has limitations
Either it exist or it doesn't and if it does exist than it has it's limitation or it cound not exist and it has to follow the laws of existence.
"ex·ist·ence
iɡˈzistəns/Submit
noun
the fact or state of living or having objective reality.
"the plane was the oldest Boeing remaining in existence"
continued survival.
"she helped to keep the company alive when its very existence was threatened"
synonyms: actuality, being, existing, reality; More
a way of living.
plural noun: existences
"living in a city was more expensive than a rural existence"
synonyms: way of life, way of living, life, lifestyle
"her suburban existence"
So when applied to a super natural Being an omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient then this all powerful all everything god must also be an atheist and not an agnostic.
It must also doubt and disbelieve in it's own existence. Simply because doubt and disbelief is part of everything.
But something cannot be true and false at the same time.
So which is it? and so for it to exist there must be limitations.
If it cannot be define, than for all intent and porpose it cannot exist.
So for all those who claim that they know their god,they are delusional or mere liars. spinning tales of myths and lies.
Second, if this being did exist it can never know the human condition and any claims to know is nothing more than a pretentious ploy.
Human beings are face with their own mortality. An immortal being claiming to know mortality lies, it knows not only that he has infinite tomorrows but he knows the future/ Can we say the same for mankind which if not the supposedly the main cause of human ,angst, but one of the causes.
Can an all everything being say the same? I think not.
Even if you allow for the sake of argument a god who is all powerful, all knowing and all good, you cannot reconcile that with any amount of human suffering. Either god isn't all good (enjoys the suffering or is indifferent to it), isn't all powerful (can't do anything about it) and/or is not all knowing (isn't aware of it). This is the so-called Problem of Evil (POE) which I prefer to call the Problem of Suffering (POS, which is also a nice double-entendre acronym).
There are only two pseudo-logical responses to this inescapable conundrum. Either throw at least one of those three "tri-omni" attributes of god under the bus (most often, omnipotence), or make some lame free-will argument (while at the same time making a completely inconsistent argument that god can eliminate suffering in the afterlife, where apparently violating human free will is no problemo).
That's why those who do believe have cognitive dissonance. LOL