Agnostic.com

5 1

“I am lucky, because I was not born in a Calcutta slum”

When you look at somebody else’s life, or some other situation much worse than your own, and make this kind of statement, you mean; that could be me, but for my good fortune of where, when and to whom I was born. This is also the meaning behind the classic saying “there but for the grace of God go I”. Put another way, you are saying: I could have had bad luck and been born into that person’s situation, their terrible circumstances, their difficult life. But could that really happen? Could you have been born into some other time or place? The answer is no, you could not have. You exist as a unique individual, the sum product of your parent’s unique genetics and the unique experiences of your environment. There is only one you.
So why is it that so many people assign good or bad luck to the circumstances of our birth, implying that they may have otherwise been in some other circumstance? This idea that a person could have been born into some other place, to some other family, in some other time even, is derived from the construct of the soul. The soul defines who you really are as a person and is distinct from your body which is only a vessel. It can carry on after your body is gone, whether in heaven, purgatory or hell. Before you are born, your soul is waiting for you up in heaven, waiting to be directed into a particular baby (now inseminated egg) to form you. In this construct, it is natural to think that this same soul could have just as easily be directed to inhabit the baby born in the Calcutta slum instead of the one born in Beverly Hills. “There but for the Grace of God go I”.
As an atheist, the problem with this idea is that none of those things could have happened because atheists reject the idea that a soul exists both before your birth or after your death. I am only myself, uniquely born to my parents. A unique combination of their DNA and the familial, social and environmental impact of the years since my birth. For me to say that I am lucky to not have been born into some other place or time (different parents), is to consider myself lucky to have avoided an event that could not happen. For it to happen, I would have to potentially be that other person, in their circumstances and their life. In a rational universe, that can’t happen because those other parents do not posses the same DNA as mine. They will produce a completely different canvas upon which to paint a life. Further, their family, friends and circumstances will shape the “other” me in ways dramatically different to my own unique experiences.
It is true that I am lucky to have been born in the first place, as the unlucky alternative is to not exist at all. However, I can’t say that I am lucky to have been born to my circumstances as there was no other alternative outcome. Consider this when you read about social policies and other ideas and arguments based on the concept of the good or bad luck of your birth and remember: there is only one you.

Motharatwins 5 Apr 27
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Do you believe in determinism?

0

You're lucky. I was born in a poor country. I lived 2 years in a run-down orphanage from birth to 2-years-old. I was adopted into a family that doesn't really want me now. Good for you though. ?

1

What you are saying is true, but that doesn't mean we can't be grateful for the circumstances of our life, and have pity on others who are not so fortunate. I would like it if you could further elaborate on what you mean by social policies and other ideas.

3

What an incredibly insular view and by the sound of it, "Consider this when you read about social policies and other ideas and arguments based on the concept of the good or bad luck of your birth and remember: there is only one you." you are using it to justify your privilege.

Though I don't believe in God I am willing to recognize that I was born into an incredibly privileged life compared to most people on this planet and that regardless of what I may have done or not done it is not sufficient to justify the massive disparity in circumstance. Life may never be fair but I for one think it is an ideal to strive for rather than the look out for number one ideal you seem to espouse.

Kimba Level 7 Apr 27, 2018

I agree Kimba. It seems like a semantic argument to suppress empathy. Yes it’s true that if you were born through different circumstances you wouldn’t be “you”; but you’d still be “somebody.” That’s all that really matters when considering my attitudes towards the population of this planet.

0

Example of such policy?

skado Level 9 Apr 27, 2018

@Motharatwins Well it’s an interesting point that I had not thought of exactly, but I’m not sure if I see any practical use for it. Are you just pointing out the superstitious underpinnings of that line of reasoning, as a bit of philosophical trivia, or are you suggesting that therefore some policies need to change? You know, just because some writer tries to sway public opinion (or just get paid for click-bait) doesn’t mean that’s the justification congress is actually using to pass laws.

@Motharatwins Yes those modes of thinking can be insidious, and developing a habit of awareness of thought provenance is always better. Trivia was not the best choice of words on my part.

Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:67875
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.