0 0

Commentary from Jeff Childers 'Coffee & Covid'

Back in April, the Journal of Clinical Medicine quietly published an explosive study titled, “The Incidence of Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Post COVID-19 Unvaccinated Patients—A Large Population-Based Study.”

The researchers studied 800,000 adults (200,000 who were covid-infected, and 600,000 controls) to see if covid sufferers were at higher risk for myocarditis and pericarditis.

Their conclusions were bleak, but clear:

Post COVID-19 infection was not associated with either myocarditis or pericarditis. We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.
It’s weird because the CDC has been peddling a fairytale for a year now that the jabs are safe because the risk of getting myocarditis and pericarditis after covid is higher than the risk of acquiring those dangerous conditions from the jab. But these Israeli researchers found the exact opposite.

Who to believe?

Not only that, of course, but the CDC’s whole myocarditis risk theory depends on the jab preventing infections, which it doesn’t. In other words, even if covid DOES increase myocarditis risk, by taking the jabs you would actually encounter DOUBLE the risk: the risk from the jab plus the risk from covid. Right? Am I missing anything?
Anyway, the good news is that the CDC will probably be updating its jab guidance any time now. I mean, it’s true they’ve already had these studies for almost a year now, but come on. They have to change their guidance soon, right?

At the very least, they have to MENTION this study?

Don’t they? Hello?

BDair 8 Nov 11

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:695000