Agnostic.com

2 2

Once again Russell knocks it out of the park. The cancel culture is out of control, and retarding scientific advancement.

Captain_Feelgood 8 Mar 26
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Well, you know if someone is claiming Graham Hancock is contributing to science, you are listening to a liar or a fool. A few minutes of his tiresome twaddle convinced me it's the latter.

2

No idea where you connect this to "cancel culture". A person is free to believe whatever they wish but to claim that your theories have merit requires significant evidence to be taken seriously. Hancock seems to want people to disregard "so called experts" and be open to pseudo-science and unsubstantiated speculations and claims.

[scientificamerican.com]

If Hancock were being "canceled" his book would have been banned and he would not have been allowed to publicly relate his ideas. But his book was indeed published, reprinted, and a follow-up book was published... all of which were sold around the world. In addition Hancock had his own series on Netflix. So, no, he was not "canceled".

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:716069
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.