On a separate legal issue, the court in a major ruling last year limited the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to address climate change under a provision of the Clean Air Act.

The issues of jurisdiction and venue may not differ much with this decision. The article used the word "should" as opposed to "must", if the decision used the same language it may not be a huge change. I have become skeptical of true legal accountability in the last several years.

It seems that the SCOTUS is taking on a life of its own: two surprising decisions within a few days (surprising if you believe that a court stacked with conservatives always makes decisions that please conservatives.