Agnostic.com

1 1

Yep not a single one of regret, not taking it

1patriot 7 Jan 31
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

1 comment

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Good to know I have the ability to resist the herd and societal pressure to conform. That my instincts were proven right. I knew new medicines need at least 5 years of trials to collect enough data before release, so when it was "Safe and effective, trust us we're experts" after only months, I smelt the rat. Impossible for them to say that with any confidence, most definitely not backed by data. I only needed a couple of brain cells to work that out.

puff Level 8 Jan 31, 2024

I am pissed about how the whole thing went down.. broke friend, family's neighbours. And now all the sick and dying. I will fight for those people believe me. It's crime against humanity nothing less!!

@1patriot The way to get them is defining the word vaccine. Vaccines provide immunity, immunity like a suit of armour. Protects you which automatically means via pure logic that you won't transmit. The scam is they changed the definition from "provide immunity" to "boost immunity" for no other reason than so they could open a new market for "seasonal vaccines". But they fucked up because we used to talk about attaining herd immunities via vaccine programs like polio, but that only works if transmission is stopped. This shows "boost immunity" as a definition for vaccine is a bullshit definition, a commercial scam.
But it goes far deeper than that, this little one word change from "provide" to "boost".

Over the years governments have got together and planned for crisis's, understanding that liberties may have to be curtailed to manage the crisis. Viral pandemics included. So, they draft legislation, emergency laws. Now in a pandemic where masses are dying, if someone invents a medicine that stops the transmission eg a vaccine..........................lets mandate vaccines. Great idea. But the drafters of these laws worked on the assumption vaccines "provided" immunity. If a vaccine was not going to stop transmission, then no point forcing people to take by mandating. What I am saying they would never have authorised mandating vaccines if they were aware vaccines only "boosted immunity" thus not stop transmission thus stopping the pandemic. Not their fault the definition of "vaccine" was changed after they mandated it in law, they could not have foreseen that.

That is the real scam, that these medicines are classed as "vaccines". Done so seasonal "vaccines" could become a thing, but dire consequences in a pandemic, run by medical scientists, viral scientists, who damn well knew "Herd immunity" was never going to happen but recommended to 6 month olds at zero risk from dying from covid. the medicines were never even tested if they stopped transmission.

So "vaccines" are the scam. They do not define "boost" in effectiveness and longevity, instead just shrug shoulders and say "not so effective this year...............but still a vaccine!" Not very scientific. Emergency legislation is very specific, only "vaccines" can be mandated, no other medicines.
A definition of "meaningful immunity" I was taught regarding what a vaccine is, which is the definition that should be bought back, is above 90% effective/ efficient and lasting over 2 years. Then you may get a herd immunity like polio.

All this is bad but we only have to uphold the principal, affirmed in the Nuremburg Trials, that informed and freely given consent, with no coercion, is required for all medical treatment. Then we can tell them to shove their vaccines and mandates up their arse if we wish.
There is never a need to mandate for medicine, for if the medicine is good, people will line up anyway.

@puff in the 1970's they come with polio drink little whitr plastic spoon with a pink dot. Our family doctor call and tol my mother for brother not to get this shot bad asthma all 6 took the drink. brother never took this drink....hasn't have any flue shots nothing a70year of his live. The doctor call him in 6 month after we all had the drink....tested him said yes he had polio and his body fought it off. There was 2 guys in neighboring town hand the shot and got polio it was it worth the risk for those two guys....we all need choice

@1patriot I defend choice put polio is the Rolls Royce of vaccines. A naturally acquired immunity, by catching it and recovering, is always superior to a vaccine induced one. The thing with polio, many do recover but many get a very severe reaction, fucked up for life. The vaccine is so good and the risk plus horrid nature of the disease is high enough that I fully recommend all get that one. You can't lump all vaccines together, it's only these seasonal ones that require boosters yearly for not devastating diseases like flu and covid ("normal" years), they are the suss ones.
A vaccine provides meaningful immunity, long lasting and effective. To get a herd immunity with a vaccine, they decided on 2 years because of logistics mainly. Enough time to get broad coverage of the herd so you can get the 60% needed vaccinated (60% at 90% efficiency= Herd immunity) at the same moment in time. Not only have to promote/ educate and administer, but produce, supply and distribute. Most vaccine's have a limited shelf life, need special storage needs etc. Now a vaccine only effective for 3 months and not stopping transmission? Not a hope of getting it out so everyone is inoculated at the same moment in time for starters. At least 2 years logistics. And "boost" doesn't cut it.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:745117
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.