Scientists from around the world have united to stand up to the green agenda by exposing the so-called “climate crisis” as a hoax.

1609 scientists, including two Nobel laureates, gathered together to sign a declaration, proclaiming that “there is no climate emergency.”

The main goal is to end the mass climate hysteria and the destruction this clamor brings to the U.S. economy.

“There is no climate emergency,” the document signed by Nobel prize recipients John F. Clauser from the U.S. and Ivar Giaever from Norway/U.S. and the others emphasized.

“Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm.

“We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero [carbon dioxide] CO2 policy proposed for 2050.

“Go for adaptation instead of mitigation; adaptation works whatever the causes are.”

They also note that climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific.

According to them, scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in the predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.

The proclamation also pointed out that Earth is undergoing cold and warm phases and they are natural phenomena and the gap between the real and modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change:

“The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases.

“The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850.

“Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming,” adding that warming is even far slower than what was predicted on the basis of modeled anthropogenic or human activity forcing.

Lately, climate alarmists and globalists are also pushing for CO2 emission reduction, even resorting to measures of taxing animals’ burps and farts just to make sure CO2 is reduced.

However, the scientists dispelled this narrative:

“CO2 is not a pollutant.

“It is essential to all life on Earth.

“More CO2 is favorable for nature, greening our planet.

“Additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass.

“It is also profitable for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.”

They do not only exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases but they also ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.

In fact, as per the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), when trees absorb and store CO2 in their fibers, it helps to clean the air.

According to the Arbor Day Foundation, a mature tree absorbs more than 48 pounds of CO2 from the atmosphere in one year and releases oxygen in exchange.

“So, you’d actually want more trees,” award-winning investigative reporter Joshua Philipp pointed out during an episode of EpochTV‘s “Crossroads.”

“If you actually believe the climate change narrative, you’d actually think that the solution is to plant more