Agnostic.com

0 0

When you are a defense organisation and others want to join, fair enough. But when that antagonises others causing friction, is it not against the intent of defense to be encouraging conflict? When the status of remaining neutral is what is causing the conflict?

A Defense organisation with an aggressive agenda to expand. Just seems a bit of an oxymoron to me.

puff 8 Mar 3
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:748815