Agnostic.com

2 1

The US, UK and Ukraine have been determined as involved in the terrorist attack in Moscow.
What does this mean?
It means Ukraine will no longer remain a country and UK and US targets there will become the priority. Russia will go whole hog now.

How stupid is the US State dept coming out and saying "It wasn't Ukraine, it was ISIS" before the incident was even over? It proves beyond a doubt they had fore knowledge. Fighters from the same area are known to fight in Ukraine, 12 admitted CIA bases on the Russian border to teach covert operations to Ukrainian's, Nuland warned of "nasty surprises" for Russia, US embassy in Moscow issued a warning to its citizens weeks ago.
Not only psychopathic, but rabid and quite inept.

[usnews.com]

puff 8 Mar 26
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

2 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

3

Only determined by Putin. It would be wrong to assume that he is any more honest and credible than any other world leader. It does not matter what goes wrong in Russia, from a plane crash to a crop failing, to an out break of food poisoning, Putin is bound to blame foreigners, because that is his game. All wars and human conflicts are started by leaders playing that game, if you can not make things work, blame foreigners, and if that does not get you enough support/votes, pretend to be the one doing something about it by attacking foreigners.

That is how all wars start. That is why the US went into Vietnam, why The UK and Chile both went to war over the Falklands, why Israel is attacking Gaza and Hamas was created by Israel.

Putin needs Ukraine the UK and the US, they are keeping him in power. Until the war started his support in Russia was failing, as soon as it began, it shot up, at least among the devoted. That UK, US and Ukraine were found by his government to be involved in the attack was inevitable, and has nothing to do with whether they were actually involved or not.

Think about it for a second, would even the most cynical of political observers, imagine that all three of those nations would get together in a conspiracy, at great trouble and expense for the sole purpose of handing Putin a very easy propaganda victory, and not one of them raised the obvious point that this would be doing exactly what Putin wants ? And without someone in their intelligence agencies, pointing out the obvious. Or that they would be so sloppy as to leave a trail, for a pointless attack that gained them nothing ? The rule of parsimony applies, that the simple explanation is the most likely, and this is just an ISIS attack. Even then it is far more credible to think, that Putin himself applied pressure or persuasion on ISIS to make the attack, which is unlikely too, but at least simpler and more logical than Putin's explanation, because he is the big winner here.

The CIA admitted it had bases in Ukraine, training for incursions and unconventional warfare.
The ISIS angle is not credible eg they made a video, with faces blurred, holding up the wrong hand when making their vow to allah. They have the perpetrators, their phone records, handlers in Turkey and communications with Ukrainian's to cross the border in a safe area. Then you have the US embassy warning that specifically mentioned "Concert Hall" as possible target and the confident "Wasn't Ukraine" within an hour by the US state dept. Add to this all the Victoria Nuland BS history of US interference in Ukraine and what would you think? If Russia I would think even if not directly involved, the US helped train Ukranian in incursion raids like this, the whole Ukraine war is over US tactical agendas in expanding NATO thus weakening Russia so if it wasn't for US bullshit meddling, none of this would have happened. Why any NATO troops will be priority targets. NATO countries have been playing this game to hurt Russia through Ukraine. Ukraine got hurt instead. Thanks NATO.
Does America understand Putin is not a dictator? He has a Kremlin to deal with? That he is the moderate one compared to others? Measured. I'm very glad he's not prone to over reacting like certain genocidal countries. He addressed Russians today calling for constraint, calming things. Unlike genocide Joe would.
Biden's admin is the problem. A grifter president too weak and gutless to put his own country before Israel's interests. Ukraine was all about NATO expansion, admitted by the Europeans, to ensure US homogony. The whole Neocon wet dream is waking up dry, older than Biden.

It was never about the Ukranian people. Never.
If there is war over Ukraine, US and NATO will lose. This is pure logistics; personnel, equipment and supply lines to keep them going. Ammo. If this happens, I really hope Russia hold a Nuremburg type trial afterwards for all those who denied Ukraine peace. Hopefully, they can right a few other wrongs like Covid and Gaza eg all those who enabled these crimes against humanity get the chance to explain why and defend themselves in a world court.
Could have been peace for Ukraine 2 years ago. Except NATO could not accept Ukraine neutrality because of Nuland's et al sick game.

@puff Sorry but in this case you just have to ask yourself the simple question. Cui bono. Who gains.
The big profiter in this is only Putin, nobody else has anything to gain from this, the idea that it may undermine Putin's credibility with the Russians is just silly, any tactical thinker can see that it was only ever Putin who would win.

Most likely, it was simply a mad incident engineered by some crackpot ISIS members, with no realistic intent, or if you must have a conspiracy, then the only credible person with anything to gain is Putin. Putin may not be a dictator , and may have the Kremlin to deal with, but if he intended to become one, then this would be a perfect move to help side-line the Kremlin.

Of course there would be evidence such as giving the wrong hand signal, if Putin had concocted the evidence, is it really credible that anyone would make a mistake that bad by accident ?

@Fernapple It doesn't matter what we think, Russians will hunt down those responsible. They have already marked the Ukranian military intelligence head.
Cui Bono indeed. Who gains? After just winning another 6 years with a 77% turnout, Putin didn't need an event to give him a mandate, he already had it.
The US have long had policy of destabilising Russian elections. An incursion occurred during elections, armed with US kit for example. Now if the cell had hit a week earlier, during the election, who Cui bono then?
It is the US claiming ISIS, discounting Ukraine. Why so sure? Does anyone in Washington know what diplomacy is?
Russia has won in Ukraine, that won't change. Just won't be anymore mucking around by Russia. Apparently end of April ground firm, so I predict Russia will bomb until then then finish things quickly.

@puff Either Putin has a major unbreakable mandate, or he still has to worry about the Kremlin. Come on, you can not have it both ways.

Also, though the CIA, for one group, admittedly have a reputation for incompetence, but to give someone who they see as an enemy, and would be dictator, everything he could possibly ask for, on a plate. Even down to obviously badly faked videos and clumsy hand gestures, that would have to be the greatest act of political and military incompetence since the Trojans bought the Greek horse. It just is not credible, the first act of sowing false information, is to be slight, you have to make your opponent work hard to dig out the errors. The only people who are likely to be fooled by that, are totally brain washed Putin devotees, and the only person with and interest confirming and reinforcing what they believe, is Putin himself. The clunky nature of the evidence, is a clear sign of who it is intended for, and by whom.

1

Any attribution for the opinions expressed here that are not contained in the news item?

Putin has made some announcements/ updates. The thing about Putin, he is a patient man but that has run out I think. The thing about Putin, he's not one to play politics nor is he one to bluff. That means you can take what he says as no bullshit. The same cannot be said for Western politicians involved with Ukraine atm.
As I said, time to take out this threat (that is Zelenskyy's government/ NATO interfering in Ukraine) once and for all, that will be Russia's attitude from now on.
In conflict, you hold back on your best unless desperate. We haven't really seen Russia's air force yet. They are taking out Ukranian airfields and air defense so I suspect we will see them soon.
If "The adults" are now in charge in the US/ UK, ffs bring back the kids.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:751379
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.