Agnostic.com

3 2

To gain better knowledge is to use your critical thinking, not your ego. Ego is quite anti the way we gain knowledge

4w4r3n355 3 May 12
Share

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

3 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

0

Just ask trumpie.

How could we ask when they do not even have the knowledge to acknowledge?

@4w4r3n355 True

1

The ego's prime directive is first survival and then expansion, not knowledge or truth.

Knowledge is what can get survival more chance and have a better outcome. Ego would kill themselves and with the deluded mind would think it is great.

3

Ego is needed to defend any belief, even justified beliefs. However, beliefs that are acquired without critical thinking are likely to be incorrect, and to be defended to avoid embarrassment rather than to substantiate what's true.

Belief is way too many flaws. Let talk about knowledge, let see what is the difference between knowledge and believe.

@4w4r3n355 As a skeptic I do not afford belief to the unsubstantiated. Because supernatural beings and realms are not only unsubstantiated, but unsubstantiatABLE, I do not afford belief to them. For the same reason, no supportable knowledge claim for OR against the existence of such things can be made.

Belief is a judgement about what is most likely to be true about a thing where there is a paucity of knowledge and understanding concerning it. As such, I agree that knowledge (the more objective or at least intersubjective, the better) is far better than belief. On the other hand, belief is adequate for inconsequential matters.

@mordant We all need to learn and use and practice Burden of Proof.

You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:79619
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.