Agnostic.com

5 2

Enjoy being online again!

Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.

Create your free account

5 comments

Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.

1

Actually that mystery has already been solved. They know what modern and North Atlantic species of fish it is. LochNess is connected to the Atlantic Ocean

t1nick Level 8 June 15, 2018
1

@SkotlandSkye On a random note, did you by chance ever use to watch documentaries and television shows on UFO's back in the late 1980's to early-mid 90's? I ask this as I need help in identifying the name of a ufo/alien series that used to air on The Learning Channel (TLC) around that timeframe. It started off by showing some guy who looked like an archaeologist searching through a cave or something. Back then TLC and the Discovery Channel rocked, and the Sci-Fi Channel had this cool show called Sightings that I was interested in because of the ufo reports.

Sightings? that's the only one I can think of off the top of my head in that timeframe....maybe something else will come to me. I worked crazy hours in the late 80s and all through the 90s. I didn't see much TV. EDITED....Oh, I just realized you said "Sightings" at the end. LOL

0

Believing in Bigfoot or the Loch Ness Monster TODAY is foolish. There was a Bigfoot-like being in our history, but I guess you could also say there were also Nessie-like beings in our history too, but the thing is that we live in a finite environment. That means if we took researching these things seriously, we would most likely have conclusive evidence one way or the other. Aliens are a little different because they are thought to exist "out there" where we can't possibly accurately research. These 2 creatures can't be that good at hiding. "Bigfoot" might have existed before, but not anymore.

A little on Bigfoot:

[news.nationalgeographic.com]

[livescience.com]

[smithsonianmag.com]

A little on Nessie too:

[thescienceexplorer.com]

0

To test DNA, you need at least a bone fragment, or scales, or hair....let us know when you find them!

read the article...there are more ways than what you list 🙂

@SkotlandSkye repeating things does not interest me, snarky summation are my thing. Bottom line, you got nuthin'

1

It's not a mystery, it's a harmless legend.

zeuser Level 9 June 15, 2018
Write Comment
You can include a link to this post in your posts and comments by including the text q:107522
Agnostic does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any content. Read full disclaimer.