no

Obviously not.

not need to teach science vs religion. Teach critical thinking and the rest will fall in place.

If you switch the words "religion" and "scientific facts" around then this sentence will make sense.

Religion (as in "Comparitive Religion" ) can certainly be an elective in upper-levels. The idea that there's a ''balanced approach'' is just nonsensical!

Nopers.

Religious history is fine in schools.

Science is for school religion for home!

I disagree with some here..I think science subjects should be the priority..but subjects like literature and the classics ie Roman & Greek culture etc are still important..myth is myth but knowing and understanding our great mother cultures is still important IMO.

Whoa ! Schools are exactly where science, and lots of other factual subjects need to be !

For the make believe , fantasy, and pedophiles , there are plenty of churches for ...uh... balance.

No. Facts take precedence over mythology.

No limits.

Absolutely not! Teach the facts!

NO!

Hell no! I do not think we shoudl accommodate those who are afraid of beign proved wrong with facts and truth.

Facts are facts. Why should these be limited. But students need to be aware of the diffference between theory and fact. For instance, the basic tenants of evolution are established fact. But evolutionary theory consists of a massive collection of facts and theory about the details. As should be the case with any good theory, some parts of the theory will prove wrong with further testing. The statement "Darwin was wrong" can be true without the basics being untrue. And some of the stuff in Cosmology and about the origins of life is speculative. Might be right or wrong without discrediting science as a discipline.

Science is science. Religion is not science. And religion is not even remotely related to science.

Is this a trick question? There should never be a limit put on teaching scientific facts.....if it interferes with, or more correctly contradicts religion, well and good!