it takes a lot of work to be human. We have come from a pool of evolution that focused on biological manipulation to survive in an ever changing environment. We, and some other species in a limited capacity, have developed the evolutionary means to do the opposite: we manipulate the environment to suit our biological needs.

in my opinion, what we face now is a period of conflict, of a prior system of survival that relies on emotional identification(good, bad, love, hate) to survive. it conflicts with our more recently evolved method of environmental manipulation. for instance, people that crave sweet or salty foods, do so because of our evolutionary identification with those substances as essential to our homeostatic body function. this is what dictates our emotions that drive us to seek out these substances, and rewards us for consuming them. we now mass produce these substances through a progression of industrial development. yet, our emotional state still dictates the consumption of these products at the same rate as when they were scarce.

we must settle this conflict as a species, and decide what will not rule our cities or nations, but will rule our minds, before we will ever reach the next step in the structures of our society.

I believe that much of what happens is because of natural instinct, "survival of the fittest", so to speak

I am what many call a naturally giving person, If I have some"THING" I rarely make an emotional attachment, even to money, so I donate a lot, buy things for people, help in as many ways as I can. BUT if there were a famine and it came to feeding my family, I think I could kill over food to survive.

Yet I still own a large house and property, have helped my 3 sons become homeowners, have helped 4 foster kids become home owners. We Have paid rent for people I have never met. But would I give them my house. NOPE, my food, Nope.

I think we are all hardwire to take care of ourselves first

Compertition and greed are our evolutionary raison d'être. It is the selfish gene with intelligence. Many people have expounded this idea of logical systems of govt from Socrates to Marx. They do not work. Many reasons have been attributed to this, Maxists will say it was the implementation and personality cult etc. but it is simply top down systems are shite.
Okay you`re planning a trip. Do you want to go to a planned city or one that just grew? Rio or Brazzaville? Manchester or Milton Keynes? Sydney or Canberra? Then you are told that you cannot go to some of these places unless you go by sailing ship because of the carbon footprint !

I tried to, it created an absolute state that ruled over a humanity under the whip forever.

Geeze .... wheres the uforic feeling of hot sex going to go? Where's that rush of meeting someone you really like and they seem to like you back? I kind of like having feelings and learning how to understand and control them...

I wonder what it would be like? Utopia or just the future?

I guess you don't listen to Radiolab, Vulcans would be poor.

money.

The world had no religion before we came along. Population limits will be impossible without war and strife, because we like sex (and that inevitably leads to procreation). To control population with abortion is barbaric and murder. I would like all religions gently pushed aside, but there is no civilized way to do so. The final points? I do not have qualms with self-interest, competition, and greed. But I do agree that power over other is pointless and grievously short lived.

ants already do that and termites

That sound like a great world. I have those same concepts bouncing around in my skull. I add one other factor, no money.

John Lennon "Imagine"