That would imply all is not lost for the USA... 29% nones, and another 30% of new age and marginal believers who can shift over in the long term.

As a semi Buddhist I suppose I go in the religiously aware segment with the new agers.

Although the preamble suggests that the categories are non-denominational there is consistent reference to the Bible. If any meaningful typology is to be presented then the content must be constructed impartially. There is an assumed propensity for Christian bias which nullifies the results.

I'd be a solidly secular person that believes religion and believers are extremely dangerous especially the ones who seem the most harmless on the surface.

I realize this typology works for the majority but I don’t fit neatly anywhere. I’m a devout practitioner of a non-congregational, science based religion. (I don’t sit in any pew)